There is much truth in this statement. The ending of the
play reveals most everything to be false. The idea of "shattering" these myths is a
powerful element in the conclusion of the play. Jim is revealed to be an individual who
is less than secure in who he is and his place in the world. At the same time, Laura's
own inflated vision that she had about him was also shattered with his ambivalence about
both his feelings towards his life and his feelings. Amanda feels that there is no way
to salvage the relationship with Tom, thinking that the entire evening was a cruel
joke. Tom's distance with the family, able to be repressed throughout the play, could
no longer be contained as he leaves, presumably without returning. In the end, when
Laura blows out the candles into darkness, she does so in reflecting the uncertain and
unclear nature of the future for the family members. The ending of the play gives the
reader the understanding that there are no more illusions left in which to believe. The
clinging to appearances that the family possessed at the start of the play no longer
exist at the end of it.
Wednesday, December 25, 2013
In Scene 7 of The Glass Menagerie, the illusions of the play are finally shattered. Explain how this statement is true.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Can (sec x - cosec x) / (tan x - cot x) be simplified further?
Given the expression ( sec x - csec x ) / (tan x - cot x) We need to simplify. We will use trigonometric identities ...
-
I can give you background on Byron's emphasis on the individual, which you can apply to the homework (the reading of the two...
-
The story is basically about a young woman whose parents have meddled in her life. The narrator, Lorna, tries to make the best ...
-
Supposing that 25,35 and 5 are degrees, we'll transform the sum of matching trigonometric functions into a produ...
No comments:
Post a Comment