Thursday, December 31, 2015

What is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the inclined plane and the object in the following case.The mass of the object is 68 kg. The...

When an object is placed on an incline which is not
frictionless, there are two forces acting on it. One is the force due to the
gravitational pull of the Earth, in the downward direction and the other is an opposing
force due to friction.


In the problem, the object does not
have any acceleration. This means that the two forces acting on it are
equal.


The gravitational force downwards can be expressed
as a sum of two vectors, one normal to the inclined plane and the other parallel to the
plane.


The magnitude of the component normal to the plane
is m*g*cos 47.9, where m is the mass and g is the acceleration due to
gravity.


The magnitude of the component parallel to the
plane and acting in a downwards direction is m*g*sin
47.9.


The force of kinetic friction opposing any
acceleration due to the the force of gravitation is N*Kf, where N is the normal force
and Kf is the coefficient of kinetic friction.


N*Kf  =
m*g*sin 47.9


=> m*g*cos 47.9*Kf = m*g*sin
47.9


=> Kf = sin 47.9 / cos
47.9


=> Kf = tan
47.9


=> Kf =
1.106


The required coefficient of kinetic
friction is 1.106

Wednesday, December 30, 2015

How might Lem's objection be raised against "Harrison Bergeron"?Lem's Objection is "The revolt against the machine and against civilization, the...

In a sense I think that Lem's objection, as you have cited
it above, is very relevant to this story. Note the way that "Harrison Bergeron" presents
us with such a tightly controlled society that any rebellion is incredibly difficult to
achieve and if successful, quickly stamped out, and eradicated incredibly violently.
Even the little joy that the story gives us, when Harrison Bergeron declares himself to
be the "Emperor" and begins to dance with his "Empress" with such beauty and joy, this
is only a short-lived respite from the regimented nature of their society. For, when
they defy gravity with their love and grace, it is precisely at this moment that Diana
Moon Glampers arrives and shoots them both:


readability="10">

It was then that Diana Moon Glampers, the
Handicapper General, came into the studio with a double-barreled ten-gauge shotgun. She
fired twice, and the Emperor and the Empress were dead before they hit the
floor.



As if to confirm this
pessimistic ending, Harrison's mother is unable to remember seeing the death of her son
on television and is just left with the physical reminder of the tears that indicate
that she saw "something real sad," although she forgets everything else. Although we
have been tantalised by the possibility of change, the pessimistic ending indicates that
nothing has and will change as a result of Harrison Bergeron's
rebellion.

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

What is the role of conversations in the novel Pride and Prejudice?

Conversations play a huge role!  Austen is the queen of
detailed, elaborate, flowery, lengthy conversations between characters.  This is why
many people struggle with her novels, and why others love them.  A conversation can
start on one page and ten pages later still be going.  Consider Austen's background and
life herself; living in England in a time when women were expected to sit around and do
practically nothing all day, what else did they have to do besides
talk?


Conversations help relay crucial and important
information, shape the characters in the novel, introduce conflict, and resolve
problems.  One major role it plays is in shaping the characters of the story.  Austen
always has a garrulous and excessively chatty character that says foolish things and is
a bore and annoyance to everyone around them (Mr. Collins, as an example).  She likes to
use conversation to shape those types of characters.  Her heroines (like Elizabeth or
Jane) are often more limited and wise in their conversations, being the listeners as
opposed to the spouters.


Consider also how much of the
NON-conversation narration in the novels centers and focuses around conversations that
were just had.  The characters not only have long conversations, but then go home and
sit there and analyze every tiny thing that was said in that conversation for potential
hidden meaning.  So even though they aren't talking constantly, most of the story IS
centered round people talking OR analyzing the talking that has occurred.  It reminds me
of a group of teenage girls talking about a party that a cute boy talked to them at, and
they all analyze and interpret, and read meaning into each and every word that poor boy
said.  That is what the characters do.


So, whether is it
actual talking to shape characters, introduce conflict or resolve it, or if it is the
characters thinking about what was just said, conversation is the main driving force in
Pride and Prejudice.  I hope that helped; good
luck!

Find dy/dx for y = ( 4x - 1)(sin3x)Step by step process

We have to find the derivative of y = ( 4x -
1)(sin3x)


y = ( 4x -
1)(sin3x)


=> y = 4x* sin 3x - sin
3x


Now use the product rules and the chain
rule


dy/dx = [4x* sin 3x]' - [sin
3x]'


=> [4x]'* sin 3x + 4x*(sin 3x)' - [sin
3x]'


=> 4*sin 3x + 4x*3*cos 3x - 3*cos
3x


=> 4*sin 3x + 3*cos 3x*(4x -
1)


The required derivative is 4*sin 3x +
3*cos 3x*(4x - 1)

What/Who do you think was Freud's greatest influence?An Autobiographical Study

Freud, like any psychological theorist, was most likely
influenced by his own life experience and development.  His father was incredibly
authoritarian like many other men during the nineteenth century.  His family did not
have a great deal of money and were forced to live in a crowded apartment.  Regardless
of their limited resources, Freud's parents made every attempt to ensure that their
children were highly educated.  Although Freud had several interests, his options were
severely limited because of his Jewish heritage.  He earned his medical degree from the
University of Vienna at the age of 26, and served as a lecturer at the
college.


Freud's most prominant research and intellectual
developments occured in his early 40's when he was suffering from several psychosomatic
disorders along with exaggerated fears of dying and many other phobias.  Furthermore, he
began to track his dreams and analyze their meaning as a method of gaining insight into
how his personality developed.  Through the process of decoding his dreams and
reflecting on childhood memories, he discovered that he felt extreme hostility towards
his father and sexual feelings towards his mother.  His development of psychoanalysis
proceeded from there.

Use the quadratic formula to solve the equation:6x^2 + 5x -3 = 0

Given the quadratic
equation:


6x^2 + 5x -3 =
0


Then we know that a = 6   b= 5   and  c =
-3


We will use the quadratic formula to find the
roots.


We know that:


x = [ -b
+- sqrt(b^2-4ac)] / 2a


==> x1 = [ -5 +
sqrt(25+4*6*3)]/ 2*6


          = ( -5 + sqrt97) /
12


==> x2= (
-5-sqrt97)/12


Then the roots
are:


x = { (-5+sqrt97)/12  ,  (-5-sqrt97)/12
}

How does character ambition form Of Mice and Men?

Steinbeck does a great job in exploring how the primary
motivations of different characters advance the narrative.  The opening section helps to
bring out two of these particular motivations in Lenny and George.  The latter's primary
motivation is to develop a means of making money, and enjoy the life associated with
it.  However, there is a competing motivation present to integrate a vision of a future
with Lennie.  The first section brings out how Lennie's hope of a farm is linked with
George.  When Lennie tells George, "I can go in a cave," if he was no longer a part of
George's vision of the future, George backs off of his own individualistic dreams and
shares the vision of the future that includes Lennie. In this dual competition of
ambition, the primary tension of the novel is present.  George's paradox of ambition
lies at the heart of the narrative.  Does one act for their own sense of being in the
world or seek to broaden it and include others in a more collective vision?  George
battles the demons associated with both throughout the novel, all the way until the end
when he takes Lennie's life.  The other characters in the novel all represent some form
of these motivations, but in the despair of the time period, Steinbeck might be making a
larger statement about where human ambition lies.  Individuals who embrace the shallow
pursuit of self- interested ends might be doomed to futility in their desire for
happiness.  Individuals who seek to embrace the more challenging pursuit of constructing
reality different than what is, embracing a more collective vision of the future,
represent  "the inarticulate and powerful yearning of all men."  Individual ambition
seems to be poised within this dynamic in the story.

Monday, December 28, 2015

Did Martin Luther King, Jr. make only a positive contribution to society or was there negativity as well?

I think that it is very difficult to make an argument that
Dr. King did anything but make a positive contribution to society. One can argue that
the damage that he did was to institutions and individuals that supported and advocated
racism.  Dr. King was able to transform the struggle for Civil Rights for people of
color into a human issue, on the same level that the framers of the nation were able to
conceive of the struggle for independence from England as a struggle for human
independence.  Dr. King was able to do this by invoking the idea of dreams and hope,
calling for change through active resistance and dispelling the call for violence, which
probably puts him on a higher moral and spiritual level than the framers of the nation
who openly called for war.  In creating "the dream" of equality and freedom, Dr. King
was able to appeal to people of color, but his reach broadened to all of those who
experienced marginalization, providing a vocabulary for "the other" to speak of being
included and eliminating the practices of silence.  Dr. King was able to give the
vocabulary and language to those who seek change and offer a vision of how society
should be as opposed to how it is.  In this light, I can only see positive contributions
that he gave to the social fabric of the time period and all that was to
follow.

In what ways does the quote "Success is somebody else's failure" apply to Julius Caesar?

You might want to think about this quote in relation to
the way in which power is shown to be grasped whenever there is a vacuum in the play.
The most notable example of this is Antony's transformation from a politician who is not
taken seriously to somebody who cynically uses the death of his former loved leader as a
podium to unleash the mob against the conspirators and ensure his own support. Surely
Antony is an excellent example of a Machiavellian politician, who sees the opportunity
to gain power through the death of Caesar and goes for it, transforming in a single Act
from a carefree politician to one that is able to chillingly discuss the murder of his
nephew and others to secure his position, even trying to turn Octavius against Lepidus
in Act IV scene 1:


readability="14">

This is a slight unmeritable
man,


Meet to be sent on errands; is it
fit,


The threefold world divided, he should
stand


One of the three to share
it?



Antony definitely shows
how success is based on or built on somebody else's failure in this excellent tragedy
that has so much to say about the grasping nature of power.

Sunday, December 27, 2015

During the Gilded Age how were the people denied democratic self government?

I would argue that it is a bit overstated to say that
people were denied democratic self-government during this time, but it is safe to say
that they had less of it than we modern people would think they should have had.  This
was largely because of the corruption that pervaded this
era.


During this time, the "robber barons" were making
their money and were using part of that money to buy off people in government.  It was
during this time that the Senate (which was not popularly elected in those days) was
seen as a group of men who had been "bought" by the big business interests.  You can see
many political cartoons from those days which show this image of the Senate.  At the
same time, there were all sorts of corruption scandals in the government.  A major
example of this was the Grant Administration, which was rocked by many scandals such as
the Credit Mobilier scandal.


Because there was so much
corruption, you might argue that people did not have as much control over the government
as they ought to have had.  In that way, you can say they were denied democratic
self-government.

In Frankenstein, when does the monster start to talk?

It is in Chapter Twelve that the creature relates how he
learnt to talk. This of course comes during his conversation with Frankenstein on the
glacier and occurs during the creature's stay with the De Lacey family. It is through
observing and listening to them that the creature learns the rudiments of speech. Note
what he tells his creator about the process:


readability="11">

"By degrees I made a discover of still greater
moment. I found that these people possessed a method of communicating their experience
and feeligns to one another by articulate sounds. I perceived that the words they spoke
sometimes produced pleasure or pain, smiles or sadness, in the minds and countenances of
the hearers. This was indeed a godlike science, and I ardently desired to become
acquainted with it."



It did
not come easy, but through application and lots of hard work, the creature was able to
learn how to speak through listening in on the conversations of this family and thus
himself was able to master this "godlike science" of communication. Thus it is that he
is able to communicate to Frankenstein at this point in the
novel.

Discuss the statement "appearances can be deceiving" based on the barber in "Just Lather, That's All."

This is definitely a very good statement to explore when
thinking about the character of the barber in this tense story. Certainly, as we
discover, there is a lot more to this timid character than first meets the eye, and you
will need to explore how the author presents the barber's involvement with the rebel
movement through the barber's first person narrative. Of course, the barber at first is
shown to be a nervous character. The mere presence of Captain Torres in his shop makes
him tremble and he is only barely able to make casual conversation with Captain Torres
whilst preparing to shave him. It is only when the barber refers to people of "our
faction" that we understand that he is one of the rebel's that Captain Torres is
determined to exterminate, that makes his position
precarious.


However, you will need to consider how this
statement can equally be applied to Captain Torres as well. His appearance does not
reveal everything about his character, as we discover at the end of the
story.

Explain the symbolism in the poem, "Roller Skate Man" by Raymond Souster.

"Roller Skate Man" by Raymond Souster is about a
physically disabled man who uses a board mounted on roller skate wheels to navigate
through the streets of the city.


The author describes the
"roller skate man" as someone who has a disproportionately large head, compared to the
rest of his body, which is shriveled, with short "stumps" for legs. The device that this
man has engineered symbolizes the man's independence: his ability to move freely through
the streets of a society with others very different than himself. He wears gloves
because he uses his hands to propel himself on Queen Street: the gloves protect his
hands because the pavement is very rough.


The crowd that he
"travels with" is made up of the successful and wealthy, symbolized by "silk stockinged
legs" and "extravagant pleats," the fancy clothing he moves past. We don't receive any
other descriptions because as the "roller skate man" moves, these are the only things
his height allows him to see. Surely he is out of place socially with these people:
especially as he travels in a world that does not see trees and beautiful store windows
and fancy cars along his route. The symbols of his confined and lowly existence as he
moves along are found in "spit, old [cigarette] butts [and] chewed
gum."


The definition of " title="flotsam"
href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/flotsam">flotsam
"
is "useless or unimportant items; odds and ends" or "the part of the wreckage of a ship
and its cargo found floating on the water." " href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/jetsam">Jetsam"
refers to cargo that his thrown overboard to lighten a ship when it is in distress. When
the author has described the man's method of transportation, and the kinds of people he
passes and what he finds on the sidewalk, I get the impression that he is comparing the
man to the well-to-do that he passes. It seems that the author is stating that because
of his disability, people may see him as something "useless." The "roller skate man" may
be the "wreckage" of a man. However, those he passes are seen by the author as what was
intentionally discarded to ease the weight of a ship in distress.
Perhaps he is saying that the "roller skate man" has elevated himself by adapting his
physical limitations to the world so that he can get around, and most of the people on
that street are just floating along as if they have been abandoned: both the roller
skate man and those around him (the jetsam) are in the water:
symbolically, neither group is in a good place.

What is the economic impact of air pollution?

Air pollution is what economists call a "negative
externality" or, as in the link below, a "external diseconomy."  This is defined in the
link as a



cost
arising from an economic activity which does not fall on the person or firm controlling
the activity.



When air
pollution happens, it is not necessarily those who pollute who have to pay the costs. 
This is a major economic impact of pollution.


For example,
one impact of air pollution is an increased need for health care.  When people breathe
polluted air too much, they often end up with respiratory problems and need medical
treatment.  They have to (or their insurers do) pay for the effects of air pollution
even if they did not cause it.


Air pollution can have more
widespread economic impacts when or if governments try to reduce it.  Governments then
have to impose regulations on firms, forcing them to pollute less.  In the short term,
at least, these regulations make those firms' costs go up and that reduces the supply of
whatever those firms produce.  This is a major reason why air pollution (greenhouse
gasses are a huge example of this) is not better regulated by the
government.


Air pollution, then, can economically impact
both individuals and whole economies.

Evaluate the given exponential expressions without using a calculator: log2 (400) - log2 (100)

Given that log2 (400) - log2
(100)


We need to find the values of the expression without
using the calculator.


Then we will use logarithm properties
to find the values.


We know that log a - log b = log
a/b


==> log2 (400) - log2 (100 = log2
(400/100)


==> log2 (400) - log2 (100) = log2
(4)


But we know that 4 =
2^2.


==> log2 (4) = log2
2^2


Now we know that log a^b = b*log
a


==> log2 (2^2) = 2*log2 2 = 2*1 =
2



Then the values of log2 (400) -
log2 (100) = 2

I need help writing an education paper???????

In order to answer the question fully, it would be helpful
to know a bit more about your topic. Are you writing about a specific aspect of
education (early childhood, middle grades, high school) or are you writing about a
specific aspect of education (reading skills, ESL, special education, curriculum
development)? There are many different topics within a subject as broad as education.
The first thing that you will need to do is determine a topic and a focus for that
topic. For example, you might decide to write about the benefits of mainstreaming
children with learning disabilities during their elementary years, or, as an opposing
viewpoint, the benefits of ESE classroom instruction for children with learning
disabilities during their formative years.


Once you have
setteld on a single narrow topic and a focus for that topic, then begin your research.
Look for valid academic sources (education journals are a good place to start) that
support your position on the subject or, if you are writing an informative piece, serve
to explain the significace of your topic.


After you have
gathered your research, outline the main points that you wish to make and then fill in
the supporting details on your outline with evidence, examples, and statistics from your
research. Remember to cite each outside reference in the text itself as well as on the
reference page. Connect each use of a source with a few ideas of your own as well so
that you are not simply collecting research.


Conclude your
paper with a restatement of the thesis, then verify that you have a unified, coherent
whole.


If you have any specific questions after you have
settled on a topic, don't hesitate to ask!

Saturday, December 26, 2015

How and when do Piggy and Simon fall in the novel "Lord of the Flies"?What does Golding mean by it?

Piggy falls slowly as the boys are more and more enamored
with Jack and his hunting party and draw away from the rules and rational approach to
trying to get rescued and running things.  Simon has been somewhat apart from either
group from the beginning and his fall is more rapid and violent as he emerges from the
woods, having found the beast to be within the boys, and is killed in a frenzy of fear
and blood lust.


Because Golding's novel was a response to
another that suggested that British boys might be above the violence and base nature
that other people succumb to, these boys fall is a statement that of course British boys
would be just as violent and as base as anyone if societal structures and norms were
removed.

Plan a trip with five people to a beach in Florida from Missouri with $1000 each.

I would make the trip by car or van. Assuming I have a
vehicle that will house five people comfortably (without having to rent one), the
distance from St. Louis to my favorite beach in Florida--Daytona Beach--is about 1000
miles. At 20 miles per gallon with a price of $4 per gallon of gasoline, the round-trip
drive should use about 100 gallons and cost about $400. I would drive via Interstates 64
to I-57 to I-24 to I-75 (Atlanta) to I-95 (Jacksonville to Daytona).  I would not try to
make the drive in one day, so I would probably stay in Atlanta (or, possibly another
favorite spot on Lookout Mountain outside Chattanooga) for one night--both coming and
going. With a hotel cost of $100 per night for two rooms each night, that totals $400.
Food for those two days of travel @ $35 per person per day = $350. Total approximate
cost for roundtrip travel between St. Louis and Daytona = approximately $1150. That
leaves the remaining amount of time and money for your stay in and around Daytona Beach.
You should be able to get a nice beach-front room in the summer for between $100-$125.
So, that will cost you (for two rooms) between $200-$250 daily. Adding a combined daily
cost for food at $35 each (x 5 people) you will be spending around $400 daily between
five people. Excluding additional gas for local transportation and any other
added expenses (such as shopping, souvenirs, drinking, sightseeing), you should be able
to stay in Daytona Beach for eight or nine days and still have some money left over.
If all five of you stay in only one hotel room (with a suite or rollaway bed or sofa)
for your entire duration, you should be able to save nearly $1000--enough money to visit
Disney World, too. Have fun.

Friday, December 25, 2015

What is the significance of Dickens's humour?Great Expectations


His ideas
were those of the inchoate and insular liberalism of the ‘thirties. His unique force in
literature he was to owe to no supreme artistic or intellectual quality, but almost
entirely to his inordinate gift of observation, his sympathy with the humble, his power
over the emotions and his incomparable endowment of unalloyed human
fun.



So writes one biographer
of Charles Dickens who composed some of his humorous characterizations for the purpose
of comedic relief from the melancholy tale of orphans, defeated old women, abused
children, and ragged convicts.  In addition, he wrote humorous sketches as entertainment
for his monthly audiences such as Mr. Jaggers's little clerk, Wemmick, with his mouth
like a "post office," a delightful character who talks to the plants at Newgate Prison,
and who sets off a cannon for his Aged Parent.  The ridiculous Belinda Pocket, consumed
in her book of titles, whose servants have a banquet in the kitchen and whose maid must
dive over her in order to rescue her children from certain death, provides much humor,
as well.  Yet, while this comedy is entertaining, it also serves a purpose for Dickens,
the social reformer.  His sketches of Mrs. Pocket and the pompous and envious Uncle
Pumblechook, for example, satirize the rising middle class of Industrial England that
envied and aspired to what Dickens considered a frivolous
aristocracy.


From Dickens, the tragedy of human life is
revealed to readers in the novel's most farcical elements. The scene, for instance, of
Miss Havisham walking about the table on which a wedding feast has laidso many sad years
ago serves in its parody of a cake and bride and toady guests to point out the injustice
of the criminal aristocrat who has swindled the decadent aristocrat while at the same
time it points to the sycophantic and avaricious relatives who come in the hopes that
Miss Havisham will die and leave them their inheritance.  By defying accepted rules of
writing narratives with his delightful, sentimental, and satiric humor, Dickens
transcended the limited sphere of the Victorian novel.  As one of his biographers has
written,


readability="8">

[Dickens] produced books to be enshrined
henceforth in the inmost hearts of all sorts and conditions of his countrymen, [while at
the same time] he had definitely enlarged the boundaries of English humour and English
fiction.


In Paulo Choelho's The Alchemist, why did the alchemist leave Santiago alone at the end to complete his journey?

With regard to Paulo Choelho's novel, The
Alchemist
, my first reaction is that at the end, Santiago must go on in order
to fulfill his Personal Legend—as as it is his—and he must do it
alone: it is his journey of
self-discovery.


Santiago has realized the connection he has
to God, and the powerful miracles he can perform because he is one with God. However, he
must travel to the Pyramids, which has been his goal all along, because of his
dreams.


However, when he arrives, he is attacked and beaten
by men who believe he has treasure. When they realize he has nothing, they prepare to
depart, but one of his attackers turns to him and he speaks of a
recurring dream he had had about going to Spain to find treasure in
a churchyard with a large tree...but what a foolish thing that
would be—to travel so far over a dream! What irony!


The boy
is elated: he had done such a foolish thing...traveling to the
Pyramids, and in doing so, the world opened up to him because he took the time to
listen, learn, and pay attention to omens, as God was speaking to
him.


The last pieces fall into
place:



The
boy stood up shakily, and looked once more at the Pyramids. They seemed to laugh at him,
and he laughed back, his heart bursting with joy.


Because
now he know where his treasure
was.



Had he not followed the
the path before him all along, he would not have realized that to fulfill his Personal
Legend, he has to return home to Spain where it all began.

What are the main points of chapter 16 of The Help by Kathryn Stockett?

In chapter 16 is one that is narrated by Aibileen.  She is
quite involved in the telling of her story and wants to get more maids involved with
Miss Skeeter in the telling of their stories for the book.  She knows that she will have
to be the "front person" because it is a bit too risky for Minny to do it, and Miss
Skeeter is a white woman whom the black maids who have immediate suspicions of. 
Aibileen is well-respected within her community and so the job falls to
her.


This chapter takes place in the immediate aftermath of
the murder of Medgar Evers.  This event has charged up the black community to protest
the unjust actions of the men who shot him in the back, and to the white community in
general.  The chapter opens with Aibileen attending a church prayer meeting.  At first
the congregation is praying for the deceased and his family, but the tone of the meeting
changes when some in the crowd start to ask "what we plan to do
about it?"  The Deacon calmly says they will peacefully march in Jackson, and may join
Doctor King in his march in Washington in August, but that isn't good enough for some of
the crowd.  It leaves everyone present with a lot to think about.  Clearly, times are
changing for the blacks and whites of Jackson,
Mississippi.


After the prayer meeting, Aibileen approaches
Yule May who is one of the most educated of the black maids in the community.  She
attended college and almost graduated.  She has two children who will be attending
college in the fall.  When Aibileen tells her about the writing project with Miss
Skeeter, Yule May is hesitant because she has a lot of financial concerns with her
children's education and can't afford to lose her job, but Aibileen knows that this
project will appeal to the intellectual/writer side of Yule May, who actually can't
resist the idea of being included.  Aibileen has succeeded in getting another maid's
voice into the book!

What are Linda Loman's parenting styles Death of a Salesman?

That is a fantastic
question!


Linda Loman is not fully, nor directly, described
as a parent in the play Death of a Salesman. Interestingly, her
parenting style can be inferred from the way that she treats her husband, Willy, and
from the way she acts towards her now-adult sons.


The
reason for this is that Linda is a conservative woman whose position in society was to
nurture both her husband and children. We know that Linda was the type of woman that
would have done anything and everything for husband. Even at an elder age, she treated
Willy like she would treat one of her sons: With compassion, mercy, and
over-protection.


We can also infer that Linda, being
submissive, let most of her boys' parenting in the hands of Willy. This way, the boys
would follow their father as a role model. Equally, Willy revelled in his sons'
successes in sports and especially in Biff's talent for football. For this reason, when
Biff failed Math and could not move on to college (nor college football), the first
person to whom he went for counseling was his father, and not
Linda.


We can also infer that Linda was not as actively
involved with the boys as Willy was because, when Willy began to act strangely, Linda
ensured that Willy was "protected" from any conflict with either Biff or Happy. Had she
been more involved with her sons, she probably would have learned to differentiate her
role towards her husband from her role in the life of her
children.


Finally, we can also infer that Linda was a type
of enabler. She enabled Willy to carry on his salesman fantasies, and she even took part
of those fantasies by pretending that everything was ok. She was also an enabler of
Happy and Biff for not putting her foot down and forcing them to get out of their
comfort zones. Above all, Linda was a parent in denial: She saw how the dynamics were
developing around her and she acted as if her life was quite normal. This is why, years
later, she encountered herself in front of two worthless adult sons and one invalid
husband to take care of.

Thursday, December 24, 2015

As you know there were "groups" the people in camp were divided into - Germans, the Kapos and the Jews. What parts did they play inside that camp?

The stratification that is presented helps to bring to
light the idea that torture and cruelty is something that was not limited simply to the
Nazis.  Rather, one of the most brutal experiences of the Holocaust was that the entire
structure of existence was predicated upon pain and brutality.  The Kapos were
representations of this idea, someone whose job became to instill order at all costs, or
to subject the victims to the Holocaust to even more degradation and brutality.  In this
light, the entire "social" configuration of the Holocaust world was one in which
brutality and a lack of dignity permeated through consciousness and being in this
world.  I think that the German Nazis started this process, representing the highest
order in society, and from this, the secondary and tertiary levels, such as the Kapos,
emulated what was being practiced at from the top down.  In this light, Wiesel seems to
be suggesting that when a social order is complicit in the degradation and indifference
towards individual suffering, bad things will always result.  The emulation of power was
seen when the prisoners start to silence one another, almost doing the work of the
Kapos, and by extension the Nazis, for them.  In this light, one of the overriding
themes becomes how the cruelty and indifference of human beings becomes so easy to
duplicate.

Who killed John Wright in Trifles?

It is clear in this excellent play that the person who
killed John Wright was actually Minnie Wright, his long suffering wife who had changed
so much through her marriage to her husband and the cold, stern disposition that he had.
Of course, the intense irony of the play is that the men are self-importantly wandering
around trying to find a motive to incriminate Minnie Wright, but it is the women, who
are mercilessly mocked and patronised for their focusing on "trifles" that actually find
the missing clue that allows them to piece together a motive that indicates it was
Minnie Wright that killed her husband.


They find a dead,
strangled canary, that obviously belonged to Minnie Wright. Of course, John Wright
himself was strangled, and note what Mrs Hale says to Mrs Wright regarding
it:



If there'd
been years and years of nothing, then a bird to sing to you, it would be awful--still
after the bird was
still.



This helps us to see
that having experienced mental, psychological and physical overshadowing from her
husband, and then having her canary strangled in front of her eyes, Minnie Wright would
have lashed out in a fit of desperation, strangling her husband in his sleep. The women
ironically solve the crime that the men are unable to do, but they choose to hide the
missing bit of evidence from them in case that leads them to blame Minnie
Wright.

Who should be indicted for a crime in The Crucible? Use pathos, ethos and logos to explain.

Abigail should be indicted for a crime because her actions
were instrumental in stirring the ashes of chaos into a conflagration. Using pathos, or
emotional pursuits, to explain why Abigail should be indicted, one must look at the
fallout from her actions.  People died.  People who were good, like Rebecca Nurse, were
put to death for no other reason than the hysteria that was the result of Abigail's
selfishness.  Abigail wanted to cover up her actions, along with those of the other
girls who went into the woods that fateful night that Reverend Hale encounterd the girls
and Tituba dancing around.  Abigail found that the cry of "Witch!" directed at Tituba in
Act 1 directed people's attentions away from her and her actions.  As soon as Rev. Hale
begins to accuse Abigail of hiding something, of leading the other girls in their
actions in the forext, Tituba enters the scene and Abigail finds a scapegoat.  It is
completely unethical (ethos) of Abigail to do this.  She is acting purely out of
selfishness.  Furthermore, Abigail accuses many other people of witchery, including her
rival for John Putnam's affections, his wife, Elizabeth.  Abigail does not believe that
Elizabeth is guilty, she merely wants Elizabeth out of the picture so Abigail can have a
better chance of getting John.  Also, Abigail threatens the other girls to get them to
do as she wishes.  When Mary tells the court that she and the other girls were lying
about being pestered by witches and Abigail points the finger at Mary, Mary changes her
testitmony and sides with Abigail again, (Act 3).  Finally, logos, or logic, shows that
Abigail should be indicted because her actions led directly to the deaths of others. 
Logically, Abigail is guilty of murder, even though she did not commit the physical act
of killing, her words as accusations, caused people to be sentenced to death as
witches.

Scout and Jem mature considerably through the course of To Kill a Mockingbird. What changes do they go through and what causes these changes?Essay...

In many cases, Jem's growth has as much to do with his
approaching puberty as the events that unfold around him. Jem is growing taller, hair is
beginning to appear in unusual places, and his moodiness bewilders Scout. Jem is showing
signs that he is outgrowing Scout as a companion, and he starts by distancing himself
from her at school. By the end of the novel, Jem is in high school while Scout is still
an elementary student. Jem and Scout are together on the night of the Halloween pageant
only because Atticus and Aunt Alexandra are unable to go; Jem serves as her adult escort
rather than as her playmate as he has in the past.


Both Jem
and Scout mature faster than most children their age. They both discover that adults are
capable of dishonesty (Nathan Radley lies to Jem), gossip (Miss Stephanie), secretly
drinking (Miss Rachel), child neglect (Dill's parents), hate (Bob Ewell), racism (the
jury), mental disease (Boo) and hypocisy (the missionary circle, Miss Gates). Bearing
witness to the trial of Tom Robinson gives them insight into an adult world that few
children their age would ever see, and the deaths of Tom and Mrs. Dubose affect them
personally. Scout does not always understand everything that she sees and hears, but
Jem has grown enough to recognize the seriousness of many of these
actions. 

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

What is Gopal Krishan Gokhale's contribution as a social reformer in Indian history?

Gokhale's primary contribution as a social reformer in the
history of India was to be one of the first to actually articulate the need for social
reform.  Gokhale understood that India was in sore need of social reformation at the
turn of the century.  He was not one who simply accepted the Status Quo.  Rather, he
recognized that India needed change in the realm of education, social equity, and
ensuring that the working class in India were still privy to being heard and validated. 
These are issues that India still struggles with today.  I think that a more interesting
discussion about Gokhale's role as a social reformer lies in his willingness to work
with the West.  Gokhale presented a model of social reform and change that depended on
the West and recognized that lasting change has to come from the Western construct that
enveloped India at the time.  While respected by freedom fighters like Gandhi, this idea
ran separate from their way of thinking.  Gokhale is one of many Indians who presented a
model of cooperation with the Western framework, oftentimes believing in its power and
possibility.  This idea of how India should interact with "the West" is also something
that resonates largely within India today.  Gokhale was one of the first in a long line
of Indian thought that struggled mightily with its relationship with the
West.

In the poem, "My Last Duchess," what is the theme of the poem?

With any work of literature there is a multiplicity of
possible themes that can be drawn out. However, examining this poem, the main message or
theme that appears to me is that of pride. As the narrator of the poem is the Duke
himself who, we discover, was so jealous of his former wife and the attention that he
perceived she gave to others, that he "gave commands" (indicating that he had her put to
death), we see everything through his eyes, and we must piece together his character. So
sure of his own situation and position that he happily narrates this tale of his "last
Duchess" to the very emissary who is organising his next marriage, almost as if it is a
warning of the kind of behaviour he expects and demands from a wife. When we think of
this, we begin to see this narrative in a different way. Really, the Duke is using this
story to outline the conditions of his future marriage and the kind of submission that
he feels he deserves from his next wife. Note what he says of his last
wife:



--and
if she let


Herself be lessoned so, nor plainly
set


Her wits to yours, forsooth, and made
excuse,


--E'en then would be some stooping; and I
choose


Never to
stoop.



Note what these lines
reveal about the Duke. He is obviously a proud man who considers it beneath his position
and dignity to discuss with the Duchess his concerns about her reactions to other men.
He clearly believes that his wants should be anticipated without the need for him to
"stoop" to ask for anything. Obviously this presents the theme of pride, as we are
struck by the arrogance of the Duke and the way he both reacted to his "last Duchess"
and his demands of total compliance of his next wife.

Are #1 and #2 true of the Second Great Awakening? I think they are. It had its greatest effect in cities on the eastern seaboard. It was led...

I do not believe that you are right about #1 or #2 being
the right answer.  The best of these answers is actually #3.  The two that you mention
have some basis in truth, but are not really true.


The
Second Great Awakening did begin in New England, but its greatest impact was more in
rural areas.  For example, the best-known area that was affected was the "burned-over
district" in upstate New York.  It was led by people concerned about a decline in
religiosity, but they were not typically leaders from "old-line" churches like the ones
in #2.  Instead, the Awakening was led by individual preachers like Charles Grandison
Finney who were not leaders and who were not part of the more staid religious
sects.


#3 is correct because many of the reform movements
like abolition and temperance came out of this revival movement.  Finney himself, for
example, was an abolitionist.  The Second Great Awakening stressed the idea of human
perfectibility and this stress inspired people to try to perfect society as well as
individuals.

In Ray Bradbury's novel, Fahrenheit 451, why is Alexander Pope's quote significant?"Words are like leaves and where they most abound,...

In Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451,
this quote by Alexander Pope is significant to the plot. In the society in which Montag
lives, people exchange words like a box of cereal across a breakfast table: it is a
mindless activity.


readability="6">

Words are like leaves and where they most
abound,
Much fruit of sense beneath is rarely
found.



Pope's quote says that
those who talk a lot will often say little of value. He is generally encouraging people
to speak briefly—with purpose, and refrain from speaking just to be
heard. In Montag's world, all the masses do is exchange shallow,
pointless conversation. People are discouraged from having original thoughts, and
encouraged to embrace the government's ideas of acceptable behavior, especially
pertaining to books. In Montag's society, words are considered dangerous when coming
from a book, but spoken words—empty of meaning or value—are preferred as long as they
stick to socially accepted rhetoric.


Conversely, Clarisse
is someone who actively pursues original thought. She notices things that the
brain-numbed masses do not, such as the dew on the grass in the morning. Her questions
are purposeful and meaningful. She is not a model citizen in this regard, and she
surprises Montag with her conversation, but he finds her words irresistible, even though
he is one that burns books.


Beatty, Montag's boss, quotes
several famous writers, including Sir Philip Sidney and Alexander Pope. His entire
purpose is to convince Montag that words and ideas are of no value. Ironically, in using
Pope's quote, Beatty is making his point: Beatty's babbling
is pointless. However, the result is
not what he hopes to achieve in Montag. Rather than being discouraged, Montag is more
convinced than ever of the importance of books and the ideas conveyed therein.
Ultimately, Montag will kill Beatty to protect his own ability to pursue the written
word.


The quote argues for substance rather than quantity.
Beatty tries to use the quote to support his stance that words are meaningless, however,
Montag perceives the true essence of Pope's words: it is not the number of words you
utter, but the substance of thought and understanding in those words that will "bear
fruit," that will be essential.

In 1984 what were O'Briens questions when Winston and Julia go over to his apartment?

O'Brien asks several very specific questions to determine
the possible loyalty that Julia and Winston might have to a rebellion such as the
alleged Brotherhood. They are these:


1. Are you prepared to
give your lives? 

2. Are you prepared to commit
murder? 

3. Are you prepared to sabotage other
people?

4. Are you prepared to betray your country to foreign
powers? 

5. Are you...


readability="13">

"prepared to cheat, to forge, to blackmail, to
corrupt the minds of children, to distribute habit-forming drugs, to encourage
prostitution, to disseminate venereal diseases -- to do anything which is likely to
cause demoralization and weaken the power of the
Party?"



6. Could you throw
sulfuric acid in a child's face?


7. Are you willing to lose
your identity?


8. Are you prepared to commit
suicide?


To all of these questions the two answered
"yes"...


9. Are you prepared, "the two of you, to separate
and never see one another again?"


Julia said she could not
do this... and eventually Winston did too.

Please provide an example of a blank verse in Romeo and Juliet.

Iambic pentameter is poetry where the syllables line up in
an unstressed/stressed fashion and there are 5 of those unstressed/stressed feet per
line.


Shakespeare often used iambic pentameter rhyming
couplets in his writing, but he was also fond of using Blank Verse in iambic
pentameter.


Blank verse is simply iambic pentameter with
the same rhythm but no rhyme scheme.


An example of this is
this speech from the prince in Romeo and Juliet:


PRINCE

Rebellious subjects, enemies to
peace,

Profaners of this neighbour-stained
steel,--

Will they not hear? What, ho! you men, you
beasts,

That quench the fire of your pernicious
rage

With purple fountains issuing from your
veins,

On pain of torture, from those bloody
hands

Throw your mistemper'd weapons to the
ground,

And hear the sentence of your moved
prince.

Three civil brawls, bred of an airy
word,

By thee, old Capulet, and
Montague,

Have thrice disturb'd the quiet of our
streets,

And made Verona's ancient
citizens

Cast by their grave beseeming
ornaments,

To wield old partisans, in hands as
old,

Canker'd with peace, to part your canker'd
hate:

If ever you disturb our streets
again,

Your lives shall pay the forfeit of the
peace.

What are cardinal vowels in relation to English vowels?

Cardinal vowels are a linguistic construction devised by
Daniel Jones to organize a consistent vowel sound classification. The classification of
vowel sounds in the cardinal organization is based on two possible tongue positions.
These are the front-to-back and high-to-low positions.
Front-to-back signifies the positions of the tongue that
range from farthest forward at the teeth to farthest backward at the throat in vowel
formations. High-to-low signifies the positions of the
tongue that range from closest to the palette of the mouth to the furthest from the
palette in vowel formations.


These two possible positions,
front-to-back and high-to-low, always actualize in pairs on
any vowel. So the cardinal vowels are recorded on the cardinal quadrilateral chart (the
quadrilateral is a visualization of the perceived increasing size and shape of the mouth
while pronouncing vowel sounds) between the two extreme sounds represented by the pairs
high front and low back
(highest and forward most tongue position to lowest and furthest back tongue position).


The vowels of all languages can be located within the
variations of this cardinal quadrilateral for purposes of
language transcription. Since the cardinal system is imperfect and rigid, very narrow,
precise transcriptions are needed to record the deviations from the Primary and
Secondary cardinal vowels in various languages.


In
English, the cardinal vowels are linked to
lexical sets to standardize the perceptions of vowel
location along the high front to low back position pairs. All English varieties employ
the same phonemes, but not all varieties employ the phonemes in the same words. For
example, in British English (BE), Received Pronunciation, the word happy has an /i/
phoneme pronounced at the orthographic /y/, whereas American English (AE), General
American, has an /I/ phoneme pronounced at the orthographic /y/.  Another example, one
using a consonant diphthong, is that in Indian English, the BE fricative /th/ phoneme is
realized as a dental plosive.


Since all English varieties
use the same phonemes, each Primary and Secondary vowel is
assigned a lexical key word to standardized its position on the high front to low back
quadrilateral chart. Of the eight Primary cardinal vowels, the high front vowel is /i/
as in BE pronunciation of the lexical pair word Happy. It is front high tense. The next
is /e/ as in the diphthong in Face. It is front mid tense. Then comes the front mid lax
sound as in the /e/ in Letter. The last of the four high front vowel classifications is
the front low vowel as in the AE pronunciation of
Palm.


Switching to the four low back classifications, the
lowest one, the low back vowel, sounds like the AE pronunciation of Lot. The next
highest position is back low open-o as in the AE pronunciation of the lexical pair word
Cloth. It is back mid lax. Next is the low back /o/ sound in AE Goat. It is back mid
tense. The highest of the low back pairs is /u/ as in the AE lexical pair word Goose. It
is back high tense.

How do people in Brave New World value youthful appearances?

The people of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World
are preserved from diseases and aging.  Their internal secretions are
artificially balanced so that they maintain what is called "youthful equilibrium."  They
receive blood transfusions, their metabolism is permanently stimulated and they maintain
mineral levels of youth.  In this way, they remain looking young.  Besides this, people
are only allowed to live until they are sixty and then they are recycled into productive
gases.


Because in her world one never sees anyone who truly
looks old,  Lenina is repulsed as she watches an old man on the savage reservation in
Chapter Seven.  His bent back, his wrinkled face, and his hobbled walk are horrifying to
Lenina. In fact, she is so horrified by the experience of the ceremony that the old man
directs that she wishes she had her soma with
her.

How does Juliet reflect the historic context of the Renaissance period?Romeo and Juliet

During the Renaissance, a wealthy woman was expected to
marry young, obey her husband and be loyal to him, and bear children, especially heirs. 
Like a young woman of her time, Juliet has a father who arranges the marriage to a young
man of family and wealth.  While other girls do not marry young because they must work
for their families, fourteen is the normal age at which wealthy women are married.  And,
the father, like Lord Capulet, makes arrangements with a suitable young man, one who has
a reputable name, position, and property.  A dowry is paid to the new husband when the
young couple are married. 


 Also, typically, Juliet is
cared for by a wet nurse just as other young wealthy women of her time are.  The Nurse
is probably a poor relative who serves in the Capulet home for her room and board; her
affection for Juliet seems to indicate that she is most likely related to the girl for
whom she is so fond and proud. 

Tuesday, December 22, 2015

To win "The Most Dangerous Game," how many days must Rainsford survive the hunt?no

General Zaroff spells out the specifics of his "most
dangerous game" after informing Rainsford that he will be the human prey on Zaroff's
next hunt. Zaroff gives Rainsford several options: He can play the game or else die at
the hands of Ivan. Zaroff will give Rainsford a day's head start; the Cossack will then
begin to track him at dusk, since 


readability="6">

"Hunting at night is much more exciting than by
day, don't you think?"



Zaroff
will give Rainsford three days. If Zaroff has not killed him by that time, he will
declare Rainsford the winner. Rainsford takes the entire three days to elude Zaroff
before implementing his unusual twist on the game.

Distinguish between Rosalind's healthy humor, Touchstone's professional humor, Jaques' satirical humor, and Corin's natural humor?

Rosalind's humor is "healthy" in that it is
compassionate.  It pokes fun, gently, at the foibles of human nature, particularly those
of men and women in love. She can even make fun of herself, as when she says to Celia,
"Do you not know I am a woman?  When I think, I must speak" (act III, scene 2, lines
247-248).  Her humor, though empathetic, is practical: "Men have died from time to time,
and worms have eaten them, but not for love" (IV,1,ll.101-102).  When she outduels
Jaques (IV,1), there is a sense that, in doing so, she is being as kind as possible
about it. Regarding his vaunted "experience," she remarks, "I had rather have a fool to
make me merry than experience to make me sad" (ll.25-27).  The greater part of
Rosalind's wit is found in the two scenes (III,2 and IV,1) in which she impersonates a
young man in order to "woo" Orlando.  This wit takes many forms, but it is always rooted
in her passion, need, desire and sympathy for her
lover.


Touchstone's humor is "professional" chiefly because
he is, of course, a professional humorist - a court jester.  He is more than able to
zing a quip here and there:  When Rosalind says, "O Jupiter! How weary are my spirits!,"
he responds, "I care not for my spirits if my legs were not weary" (II,4,ll.2-3).  When
she refers to Orlando's verses to her, saying "I found them on a tree," he retorts,
"Truly, the tree yields bad fruit" (III,2,ll.115-116).  Much of Touchstone's humor,
however, comes in the form of monologues, speeches so witty and complete they seem to be
rehearsed "party pieces."  Three clear examples of these comic tirades are his bit about
being in love with "Jane Smile" (II,4,ll.44-54), his parody of Orlando's poems to
Rosalind (III,2,ll.100-112), and his dazzling discourse "Upon a lie seven times removed"
(V,4,ll.69-103).  As a professional, Touchstone has a comic monologue ready for almost
any occasion.


As funny as Touchstone is, however, he cannot
get the best of Corin.  In fact, in act III, scene 2 (ll.11-69), the shepherd seems to
out-jest the jester.  In a sinuous argument in which the court clown attempts to trap
Corin and make him look foolish, the latter trips up the former, "hoisting him by his
own petard."  In making Touchstone assert that "civet is of a baser birth than tar,"
Corin makes him admit that the "shepherd's life" is superior to that of the court. 
Corin doesn't manipulate towards this end; he simply states what he knows to be true and
watches as his motley friend hangs himself.  He is not at all the "natural" that
Touchstone takes him for.


The humor of Jaques is, perhaps,
the most complicated.  Although he is primarily associated with "melancholy," he is ripe
with sharp wit - not as polished, perhaps, as that of Touchstone; certainly not as kind
as that of Rosalind.  When the singer says to him, "My voice is ragged, I know I cannot
please you," Jaques quips, "I do not desire you to please me, I do desire you to sing"
(II,5,ll.13-15).  After using a strange word to gather his mates around him, one of them
asks, "What's that 'ducdame'?" - to which Jaques replies, "'Tis a Greek invocation, to
call fools into a circle" (II,5,ll.52-54).  One of the most unique moments in the play
(and, perhaps, in Shakespeare) is when, in act IV, scene 1 (ll.28-30), Orlando says,
"Good day and happiness, dear Rosalind," and Jaques exits, saying, "Nay, then, God be
with you an [if] you talk in blank verse."

How do people react to Elizabeth and how does Victor feel about her in Frankenstein?Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

Elizabeth is a constant joy to the Frankenstein family; in
fact, the parents have always hoped that Victor would marry this lovely girl who comes
to the defence of Justine Moritz, the accused murderer of William Frankenstein.  Even
Victor, who knows that Justine is innocent is not as willing as Elizabeth to defend
her.  That he dissembles around Elizabeth is, indeed, an indictment against the
integrity of Victor.  In Chapter 7 he tells Elizabeth


readability="8">

'She [Justine]is innocent, my Elizabeth...and
that shall be prove; fear nothing, but let your spirits be cheered by the assurance of
her acquittal.'



Yet,
selfishly, Victor Frankenstein does not come forward with the truth; instead, he leads
Elizabeth to believe that he is "kind and generous."


This
selfishness is also blatantly evident after the creature tells Frankenstein will be with
him on his wedding night, and Victor refrains from telling sweet Elizabeth anything. 
Fatefully, she becomes a sacrificial victim to the ego of Victor Frankenstein. At the
end of Chapter 7 Victor even accuses himself:


readability="11">

Thus spoke my prophetic soul, as, torn by
remorse, horror, and despair, I beheld those I loved spend vain sorrow upon the grave of
William and Justine the first hapless victims to my unhallowed
arts.



Elizabeth, the lovely
girl who "possesses a certain power over our minds which hardly any later friend
can,"--he loves her --becomes a sacrificial victim for the creature of Victor, "the
author of unalterable evil."

Please explain Catholicism and emotion in Catcher in the Rye. How is it important, and what does it symbolise?I am writing an essay about Catcher...

There's two instances of Catholicism in The
Catcher in the Rye
: one with Ackley at Pency and one at breakfast with the
nuns.


Holden asks
Ackley:


readability="6">

"Listen. What's the routine of joining a
monastery?" I asked him. I was sort of toying with the idea of joining one. "Do you have
to be a Catholic and
all?"



readability="6">

"Certainly you have to be a
Catholic. You bastard, did you wake me up just to ask me a dumb
ques-



readability="8">

"Aah, go back to sleep. I'm not going to join one
anyway. The kind of luck I have, I'd probably join one with all the wrong kind of monks
in it. All stupid bastards. Or just
bastards."



Holden is
definitely a conservative: he relishes the past and doesn't want to grow up and be a
phony materialist.  He wants to live a holy life, but he doesn't know how to do it.  His
father was a Catholic, but he left the church when he got
married.


Like everything else, Holden is caught in the
middle.  He's not a child or an adult: he's a teenager.  He's not a Catholic or a
Protestant.  He's not a lover or a fighter.  He's desperately searching for a place to
call home.  He runs away from home and school.  Could he find a home in the church or a
monastery?


Holden also fears being a hypocrite, or a phony.
 He wants to live a quiet life surrounded by books instead of people and money, but he's
afraid that he'll be the "wrong kind of monk," a "stupid
bastard."


Later, on his run-away journey in the city,
Holden sees two nuns and their dilapidated suitcases.  The nuns also are symbols of
holiness, and their suitcases are symbols of modesty, humility, and anti-materialism.
 Holden likes the way they look and the way they "never [go] anywhere swanky for lunch."
 As such, nuns are some of the few non-phonies in the entire
novel.


These nuns are teachers too.  Holden gets into a
conversation about the nature of tragedy, focusing on Romeo and
Juliet
's first character who dies, Mercutio.  Holden loves Mercutio because
he's an outspoken rebel, like himself.  Holden really shows his intellectual and
emotional side with the nuns.  He gives them ten dollars, mainly because he doesn't like
to see cheap suitcases.  Like him, the nuns are travelers, and rather than engage in
empty small talk, like the girls in the Lavender room, the nuns engage in meaningful
conversation.  Holden feels like a pilgrim talking to
them.


All this is echoed near the end of the novel when
Holden gets advice from Mr. Antolini, an Italian and--like Mercutio and the nuns--likely
a Catholic.  He says Holden is “in for a terrible
fall”:



"The
mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of
the mature man is that he wants to live humbly for
one."



Was Mercutio a noble
man?  Are the nuns noble?  Would Holden be noble if he becomes Catholic?  Or joins a
monastery?  What is Holden's noble cause?


Holden could end
up like Mercutio or the nuns.  He could die for a noble cause, like Mercutio and James
Castle, both of whom committed suicide.  Or, he would live humbly for one, like the
nuns.


In the end, what does he choose?  We don't know.
 But, we do know that he lives to tell his tale.  And, his "rest home" sounds a lot like
a monastery of sorts.  Ironically, too, Holden's creator J.D. Salinger, a Jewish
Catholic himself, became a monk after writing this book until his death.  No one saw his
face for 50 years.

How Gustave Flaubert showed his disaappointment with middle class in his novel Madam Bovary?

The disappointment experienced by the characters is mainly
the lack of money versus the fantasized version they have of what happiness and
contentment should be. Madame Bovary had come from a well-to-do family when she married
Dr. Bovary. Both were at first content with what they
had.


Yet, Flaubert lets us in the know of Emme's tendencies
when she was younger in the convent, how she lived on romance novels and romantic
stories where people always dressed well, and nice aromas always filtered, and she
stayed in that fantasy. Hence, the preoccupation she has with money and riches occupied
her mind and put values and common sense in second place. She felt of her current status
as dull, boring, intolerable, and classless and kept day dreaming about a life of
richness.


Later in the story, when the Bovaries receive the
invitation to the Marquess home and she dances with the Viscount, she sees THAT as the
perfect moment of her life. Nothing is important: Not health, nor family- just the
fantasy.


Therefore, Flaubert may show dissappointment
through his characters in that all that was material and superficial was what was
important to Emma, and that there is a massive chasm between her comfortable life and
that she aspires to live in opulence and ritual.

Evaluate the limit of the function [(3+h)^2-9]/h, if h approaches to 0.

If we'll let h=o, we'll get f(0)
undefined.


Since h is cancelling the numerator, that means
that h is the root of the numerator.


We'll expand the
square from numerator and we'll get:


(3+h)^2 = 9 + 6h +
h^2


We'll subtract 9 both
sides:


(3+h)^2 - 9 = 6h +
h^2


We'll re-write the limit of the
function:


lim (6h + h^2)/h = lim
h(6+h)/h


lim h(6+h)/h = lim (6+h) = 6 + 0 =
6


The limit of the function, if h approaches
to 0, is lim [(3+h)^2-9]/h = 6.

Monday, December 21, 2015

Can you understand Joshua’s beliefs and behavior? Do you feel any sympathy for him? His daughters? His wife?

I feel sorry for Joshua because the writer uses him to
express his displeasure with christianity and to criticise the 'holier than thou'
attitude showed by some pastors. A father who is so unforgiving, impatient and driven
only by his blind belief that everything the white man says is true and from God, all
cut the image of a brainwashed naive character. The way he treats others does not
reflect the teachings of the blble which he portends to preach. For example, we know
that forgiving is biblical, but he does not forgive his daughter.He should love her
unconitionally. I feel sorry for his family, sice they are caught in circumstances
aginst which they are powerless, since Joshua who is the head of the home is a dictator.
However we know that deep in him he loves even Muthoni.It is only that he cannot mourn
her, but later on he complains bitterly to Waiyaki, accusing him of planning to take
away this other daughter, Nyambura.He actually loses the two girls. The auther thus
criticises the extremes of blindly following religion to the extent of being
inhumane.

The significance of the character Boo Radley becomes evident at the end of To Kill a Mockingbird. Why is he essential to this story?(Do not answer...

In addition to coming to Jem and Scout's rescue and saving
their lives (it is a crucial part of the story, after all), Boo serves as the character
who connects the two main plots together at the end. The mystery surrounding Boo in the
first half of the novel shows the children slowly understanding that Boo is not really a
bad guy after all. This transition serves to illustrate one of Atticus' famous
sayings--



"You
never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view--until
you climb into his skin and walk around in
it."



Boo is also a symbol of
the children growing up, realizing that the rumors that they had heard for so long about
Boo were untrue. Boo is also one of the human mockingbirds in the story--an innocent man
accused of terrible things. Boo's rescue of the children from the murderous hands of Bob
Ewell connects the second plot of the story--that of the Tom Robinson trial--when Boo
kills Bob, Tom's false accuser. It marks the completion of the transition from Boo the
Ghoul to Arthur Radley the Hero.

According to Guns, Germs, and Steel, what major elements separate the world's "haves" from the "have-nots"?

To Diamond, the "ultimate factor" that determines which
societies become "haves" and which become "have nots" is geography.  Societies that
developed in places that had many domesticable plants and animals had an advantage,
particularly if it was easy for those species to spread across a large area.  So
geography is the major cause of the fact that some societies became richer and more
powerful than others.


More proximate causes are technology,
epidemic diseases, and political organization.  The political organization allowed some
societies to extract taxes from their people and then to create centralized governments
with militaries and bureaucracies.  Such societies had an advantage over less organized
ones.  The impact of technology and diseases are more obvious.  Technology allowed some
societies to be more powerful economically and militarily.  Diseases allowed some
societies to decimate the populations of others without even
trying.

What is the comparative central idea with Olsen's "I Stand Here Ironing" and "A Conversation with my Father" by Grace Paley?The only thing I have...

In accord with your assessment, in an interview with the
Shenadoah Review, Grace Paley, author of "A Conversation with my
Father," declares that the story 


readability="9">

...is about generational attitudes about life,
and it's about history...[The narrator] was really speaking for people who had more open
chances. And so she brought that into literature, because we don't just hop out of our
time so easily.



Likewise, "I
Stand Here Ironing" by Tillie Olsen is concerned with the open-endedness of life.  In a
conversation with a school official, Emily's mother is unable to account for "all that
life that has happened outside me, beyond me."  She says that she will never "total it
all."  There is too much that Emily has kept to herself and too much that the mother has
learned too late.  But, the mother is resigned:


readability="11">

She is a child of her age, of depression, of
war, of fear. 


Let her be.  So all that is in her will not
bloom--but in how many does it?  There is still enough left to live by.  Only help her
to know--help make it so there is cause for her to
know-- 



In the case of
Paley's story, the father, an immigrant from Russia has a different perspective on life
from that of his daughter; he is similar to the school official who has a preordained
idea of the structure of life.  That is, he feels that the woman's action of becoming an
addict foretells her ultimate tragedy because in his life in Russia there were "no
choices," as Paley relates.


Similar to the mother of "I
Stand Here Ironing" is the author daughter of "A Conversation with My Father." 
Declaring that her daughter is "a child of her age," she is "more than this dres on the
ironing board, helpless before the iron."  Emily can change the direction of her life,
she can make choices.  The daughter who writes the story for her father contends that
people can change careers; things are "of small consequence."  But, the father, like the
school official, believes everything in life is "of great
consequence."


Clearly, one's perspective is determined by
one's time and generation: "We just don't just hop out of our time so easily."  While
the Russian father does not understand, Emily's mother whose metaphoric ironing takes
her back and forth, back and forth through time, does comprehend that her daughter must
be perceived through the open-ended lens of her time, as she is still "becoming" just as
the boy's mother, who is only forty, still has time to improve her
life.

How did America convert from a peacetime economy to a wartime economy during World War I?

The US government did a number of things to help the
American economy convert to a wartime economy.  Overall, this was a conversion that was
driven by the government rather than a simply voluntary one on the part of
businesses.


The government created a number of wartime
agencies that were meant to convert the economy to a wartime footing.  For example, the
Food Administration was created under the direction of future president Herbert Hoover. 
This agency got farmers to produce what was needed by offering high prices.  It also
encouraged people to cut back on their consumption of things like meat and wheat so as
to leave more for the soldiers.


Another major agency was
the War Industries Boards.  This board took supplies requests from the US and other
allied governments.  It then decided which things were most important and had them
made.  It allocated the raw materials to various factories and told them what to
produce.


Overall, then, this conversion was done by the
government using a variety of boards that ended up getting businesses and people to do
what was needed for the war effort.

How Is Juliet cooperative, affectionate, sincere, mature, courageous, heroic, decisive, devoted, loyal, faithful & passive in Romeo and Juliet?

Here goes:


Cooperative-
Juliet agrees to consider Parris as a potential suitor at her father's party, even
though she says she's not particularly ready to consider
marriage. 


Affectionate - The person Juliet is most
affectionate with is the Nurse. They apparently tease one another, and Juliet literally
hugs her when she comes back from talking to
Romeo. 


Sincere - When she tells her father she has not
even thought of marriage, Juliet exhibits
sincerity. 


Mature - She is immature and impulsive most of
the time after she meets Romeo, so any maturity is displayed before that.  (See Sincere
and Cooperative.) A case may be made that after she gets the potion from the Friar and
becomes an obedient daughter (knowing she's not going to have to actually marry Parris)
she is showing some maturity. When Juliet does not, for once, share her plan with the
Nurse, she exhibits mature behavior.


Courageous - When
Juliet takes the Friar's potion, she show courage--though she's young and may not even
recognize the dangers inherent in such an implausible plan.  Certainly when
she buries Romeo's dagger in her breast she shows extraordinary courage and
conviction. 


Heroic - See
Courageous.


Decisive - Choosing to marry Romeo after just a
few hours' acquaintance shows decisiveness, as does her determination to carry out the
Friar's plan. 


Devoted - Juliet is clearly devoted to the
Nurse, her father, and Romeo--though she breaks faith with all but Romeo throughout the
course of the play.


Loyal - She is loyal to both her
beloved cousin Tybalt and her husband Romeo, though her loyalties are tested when one is
killed by the other.


Faithful - See
Loyal.


Passive - Agreeing to consider a man she hasn't even
met as a husband is the epitome of passive.

Sunday, December 20, 2015

How does Malvolio reflect contemporary attitudes against the theatre in Twelfth Night?

Let us remember that Malvolio is described, rather
insultingly by Sir Toby and Maria, as a "very Puritan." Puritans stood against drama and
the theatre in Shakespeare's day, and their approach to religion was to adopt an
incredibly plain form of worship. Their clothes were just black and white, and any form
of merriment or diversion was frowned upon, meaning that theatregoing was completely
out. Thus we can see in the way that Malvolio is punished that perhaps Shakespeare is
definitely going for the crowd pleasing approach. The scenes where Malvolio is abused
and locked in a dungeon, and made to believe that his mistress is in love with him,
would have been hilarious to an audience of theatregoers who probably disagreed with the
Puritan creed of simplicity and to whom Purtains were figures of fun. Let us remember
that the Puritans faced so much opposition in various forms that they left to found a
new religious community in New England on the Mayflower. Thus we can see in the
character of Malvolio the stark simplicity and theology of denial that was so unpopular
in Shakespeare's day. Malvolio is a character who would have opposed the merriment of
the theatre, and so having him punished in such a public way through that medium adds to
the irony of the situation.

Langston Hughes's poem "I Too" from 1926 Does this poem seem ovewrtly personal, political, or both?

Although of course we cannot confuse the speaker in a poem
with the author, it's not hard to imagine that Hughes draws on his own experience with
racism in Ameria when he speaks of how some Americans are seen as less important, 'the
darker brother,' sent to eat in the kitchen.  The poem feels immensely personal also
because it is set in the home, the kitchen and dining room, the sites of so much family
interaction over meals.  We can assume that Hughes speaks of a political future in
America, when everyone has a place at the table, but the personal takes the primary role
as he concludes, "Besides, they'll see how beautiful I am," thus, perhaps, healing some
small part of the injustices and pain of the past.

What is the theme of "Dover Beach" by Matthew Arnold?

Central to understanding this poem is recognising that
through it Arnold is lamenting the loss of faith or culture in his society and painting
a picture of a world that, as a result of this loss of faith, is full of cruelty,
uncertainty and violence.


Note how the sea imagery develops
this theme. Reference to the "Sea of Faith" and its gradual withdrawal from the coast
indicates that Arnold considers its loss is a negative
occurrence:


readability="14">

The Sea of
Faith


Was once, too, at the full, and round earth's
shore


Lay like the folds of a bright girdle
furled.


But now I only
hear


Its melancholy, long, withdrawing
roar...



Note how the sound
the Sea of Faith makes as it withdraws is described as "melancholy" and that as it
leaves it exposes the "naked shingles of the world," leaving the world exposed,
vulnerable and open to wounding.


The final stanza describes
Arnold's view of this new world that is marked by its absence of Faith. This world,
although it may appear to be "like a land of dreams," actually is not. Instead
it:



Hath
really neither joy, nor love, nor light,


Nor certitude, nor
peace, nor help for
pain...



As a result, Arnold
imagines that he and his beloved are on a "darkling plain" only listening to the sounds
of "ignorant armies" clashing by night. In such a world, love is the only consolation
that can be found, and therefore, the speaker urges his lover and himself to "be true to
one another."

Discuss the theme of John Milton's sonnet "How soon Hath Time."

This moving sonnet starts off initially as a reflection on
the strange way that time has of quickly passing us by. The speaker reflects how time,
whom he personifies as "the subtle thief of youth," has "stolen" his "twenty-third
year." However, this leads the speaker to reflect about not just his maturity in terms
of his age, but also the maturity in terms of his gifts. Thus the speaker refers to his
"inward ripeness," that "timely-happy spirits endu'th." This is a clear reference to the
poetic gifts that the speaker feels he has been given, though they may not have fully
matured like he has in his physical body. However, above all, he entrusts his life and
his poetic giftings to God, who is the source of both. Note how the sonnet
ends:



All is:
if I have grace to use it so,


As ever in my great
Task-Master's eye.



Thus we
can say that the theme of this poem is entrusting our talents and gifts into God's
hands, trusting that he will develop and mature them, as well as giving us the correct
time and opportunity to practise, develop and use them for His
glory.

Saturday, December 19, 2015

In light of "The Reward" by Lord Dunsany, how do people fail in life?

"The Reward" by Victorian writer Lord Dunsany (1878-1957)
implies that failures in life come through disregard of higher values while in the
pursuit of baser values. The opening line, "One's spirit goes further in dreams than it
does by day," suggests that sight and understanding are limited by our waking state and,
in keeping with Freudianism, given expanded awareness in
dreams.


The human failure in "The Reward" is that some
unidentified individuals "invented a new cheap yeast." This invention was within the
bounds of the legal structure (“But they drove a perfectly legitimate trade, … the law
allowed it.”) but outside the bounds of a higher moral structure: “‘They shall look at
it for ever,’ the angel said.” The angel who has descended to Hell to build an expansion
of Hell's domain says that on one Christmas Day when he rested, he witnessed "little
children dying of cancer." The implied connection is that they were dying of cancer
because of the "new cheap yeast."


Dunsany is suggesting
that the higher values of respect for humanity and love of human life were disregarded
by the inventors of the "new cheap yeast." Conversely, Dunsany is implying that the
baser values that were pursued were greed, disregard for human life, and selfishness. It
requires all three baser values to be in play for an individual or group of individuals
to prosper on an invention that leads to children's illnesses and
deaths.

In Book II Ch.1-12 in A Tale of Two Cities, compare Darnay's revelation that he wants to marry Lucie to Stryver's revelation.

In Chapter 10 of Book II, Darnay declares to Dr. Manette
the love that he has long harboured for his daughter, Lucie. Dickens tells us
that:



He had
loved Lucie Manette from the hour of his danger... But, he had not yet spoken to her on
the subject...



Recognising
how important Dr. Manette is to Lucie, Darnay decides to speak to him first before
speaking to Lucie. Thus Darnay declares his love in rather traditional and stilted
language:


readability="17">

"You anticipate what I would say, though you
cannot know how earnestly I say it, how earnestly I feel it, without knowing my secret
heart, and the hopes and fears and anxieties with which it has long been laden. Dear
Doctor Manette, I love your daughter fondly, dearly, disinterestedly, devotedly. If ever
there were love in the world, I love
her."



One cannot doubt the
sincerity of Darnay's serious language, and yet the alliteration in "dearly,
disinterestedly, devotedly" seems to undercut the fervency of this revelation, making
his declaration somewhat lacking in substance, although obviously very
powerful.


In Chapter 11, on the other hand, we have another
revelation of love for Lucie, but made in very different terms. Stryver dangles the
information in front of Sydney, trying to make him guess who he has decided to marry.
When he does not want to play, Stryver tells him,
saying:



"I
don't care about fortune: she is a charming creature, and I have made up my mind to
plese myself: on the whole, I think I can afford to please myself. She will have in me a
man already pretty well off, and a rapidly rising man, and a man of some distinction: it
is a piece of good fortune for her, but she is worthy of good
fortune."



How different a
declaration! The manner of playing with this information in front of Sydney indicates a
frivolous desire and the declaration when it comes is all about Stryver's needs and
wants, and how he can please himself. He uses the declaration as another opportunity to
boast about his prospects and assumes that his offer will be accepted because it would
be "good fortune for her", not worrying about Lucie's feelings in the
matter.


Two very different declarations therefore, but you
really should compare these declarations with Sydney's declaration of love for Lucie in
Chapter 13. Darnay's declaration is stilted but sincere, Stryver's declaration is
inappropriate and arrogant, but true depth of feeling and emotion is revealed by
Sydney's declaration in this Chapter.

Discuss Eliezer's admittance to the camp's hospital in "Night."

Eliezer has to be taken the camp hospital in Buna because
of the swelling in his foot.  Fundamentally, this strikes a level of fear in Eliezer in
a couple of ways.  Initially, Eliezer is afraid that his foot will be amputated by the
doctors, making him unable to work and be deemed as "productive."  This also feed into
the fear that his staying in the hospital will make him easy prey for the Nazis, who
were more concerned with killing off the weak and the sick than anything else. 
Additionally, I would suggest that Eliezer's admittance into the camp hospital poses a
dilemma that strikes at the basic themes of the narrative.  When the Russian army
advance feeds the need to evacuate the camp, Eliezer and his father have a critical
choice to make.  Either they stay in the hospital or they evacuate it.  The fear is that
if they stay in the hospital, they will be shot.  The belief is that evacuation gives
them their best chance of survival.  The opposite turns out to be true, in that the
Russian army came in and liberated those in the hospital.  This helps to bring out that
the logic and rationality that guided decisions was futile, at times, in that the
Holocaust was a moment in time where values were inverted.  What was perceived as
rational was actually the opposite.

Can (sec x - cosec x) / (tan x - cot x) be simplified further?

Given the expression ( sec x - csec x ) / (tan x - cot x) We need to simplify. We will use trigonometric identities ...