Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Why could it be argued that Progressivism was a conservative movement?

I rather doubt that it can be considered progressive. The
entire program of the Progressive movement was reform. The mantra of the movement was
that the cure for the ills of democracy are more democracy. Although two Presidents,
Roosevelt and Taft, might be considered progressive, they were not typically
conservative. Roosevelt went after big business with a vengeance in his "trust busting"
campaign. His activities upset J.P. Morgan so much that when Roosevelt went big game
hunting in Africa, Morgan commented, "let every lion do his
duty."


Big business was often the target of the movement,
not its darling. At a time when a high tariff would have supported big business,
President Taft worked for a lower tariff. The progressive movement also supported the
nomination of candidates for political office by primary. The old system, nomination by
convention, allowed party insiders to control matters. Additionally, the 17th Amendment
was passed which provided for direct election of
Senators.


I'm not sure where the idea came from that the
Progressive movement was conservative; but anyone who argues that position, in my humble
opinion, is fighting a losing battle.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Can (sec x - cosec x) / (tan x - cot x) be simplified further?

Given the expression ( sec x - csec x ) / (tan x - cot x) We need to simplify. We will use trigonometric identities ...