Can someone please check my grammar?Ferry spoke about three order of ideas. Frist, the economic benefit, he said that France needs foreign markets...

Below, I have bolded my changes, as well as a question I
have to clarify the sentence in question. Some changes reflect a word change or the
corrected spelling of a word, so compare your original the
the adjustments carefully. If the first letter of a sentence is bolded, it means it must
be capitalized. The first paragraph, noting the three orders of ideas, has several
changes (and there are a few later in your piece) that changes the verb tense. If you
are speaking of the past, it is best when reporting facts (as opposed to writing a
creative piece: poem, short story, etc.) to stick to the past
tense.

Pay special attention to punctuation that is bolded:
it may not show up as clearly as the words do.  Good luck! Hope this
helps.

GRAMMAR

Ferry
spoke about three orders of ideas. Frist, the economic
benefit: he said that France
needed foreign markets to which it
could sell its industrial products because the U.S had taken a position
of protectionism. At this time, France had no more markets to expand in Europe because
the competition was fierce. Second,
expand civilization and its highest
sense: he believed that Europeans
were a superior race and they
had a duty to spread their supreme civilization. Third,
political patriotism: he said that in order to protect the
interest of the nation, France needed to expand
its military power. He also believed that France should not
be just a free country but a great country.

Roosevelt's
argument on imperialism was that in order to become a great
nation, the U.S needed to get involved in world politics.
Otherwise the U.S. would be recolonized.
He also said that it
was America's duty to civilize the "savage anarcist" living
in the land that they had gained from
Spain.

Opponents of the Roosevelt's arguments believed that
becoming an imperial power
clashed with the nation's
commitment to liberty and freedom. Roosevelt argued that if they were
adopting such doctrine at its (whose core?)
core, it would be like condemning the United States'
founding fathers for ever having settled in the
U.S.