Thursday, January 31, 2013

Summary and main points of Chapter 9?

In the book In the Time of Butterflies
Chapter 9 is Dede's explanation of her own desire to try and be a part of her
sister's commitment but then again he commitment to her own family.  She had been having
marital problems between her husband and herself.  She had chosen to see the town priest
and she realized that he was part of the underground
movement.


When Dede returned home her husband had taken off
with the boys and gone to his mothers.  She was in a panic.  Part of her had wanted to
be part of what her sisters were doing but she could not risk losing her boys.  Her
sisters and brothers in law wen with her to talk to Jaimito at the mother-in-law's
home.  Dede ended up getting back with her husband and they went on a trip to where they
had gone on their honeymoon.  However, something inside her had
changed.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Using the density of air in a hot air balloon, explain why it rises.A graph has temperature in K on the x-axis and volume in cm^3 on the y-axis....

A hot air balloon rises when the air filled in the balloon
it is able to displace a volume of air that has a mass greater than the mass of the
balloon. This follows from Archimedes' Principle. The balloon continues to rise till the
condition mentioned earlier is satisfied. When the mass of the air displaced by the
balloon is equal to the mass of the balloon, it floats.


As
you can see from the values in the graph, air expands when it is heated. The expansion
means a decrease in density as density is given by mass/volume. You can see by the
points on the graph (278,110), (283, 112), (288, 114), (293,116), (298, 118), (303, 119)
that a point with a higher x-coordinate also has a higher
y-coordinate.


Atmospheric air cools as the altitude
increases. The balloon will rise till a certain altitude based on the temperature of the
gas filled in it. If the temperature of the gas is increased, it rises higher; on the
other hand, if the temperature of the gas filled in it is lowered, it drops to a lower
altitude.

How is the character Emilia related to the theme "loyalty vs. betrayal" in the play Othello?(quotes related to this theme)

To add to the previous editor's comments, Emilia's
loyalties shift from her husband Iago to her mistress
Desdemona.


We see Emilia stealing the handkerchief for Iago
in Act 3.  It's an harmless act, she thinks, and she has no idea what her husband
intends to do with it.  She also has no idea that her husband is a villain.  She is too
quick to think his failings are the general failings of all men, not just her husband:
 "Methinks it is the husband's fault if wives do fall,"  she tells Desdemona.  So, when
Desdemona frantically searches for her handkerchief, Emilia stands by
silently.


However in Act 5, when Emilia discovers her dying
mistress, she threatens to expose her murderer to the world.  "I care not for thy
sword," she tells Othello who has threatened her when she is about to make his act
public. This is a powerful act of courage.  She defies Othello--her superior, a man, an
armed man.   When Iago tells Emilia to be quiet, Emilia tells those around that "Tis
proper I obey him, but not now."  She tells the truth about the handkerchief and says to
Iago, "Perchance I'll never go home again."


The one person
Iago misjudged was his wife.  He assumed that she would be his loyal, faithful, and
submissive wife.  In the end, Emilia valued her friendship with Desdemona and the truth
more than her vows to her husband.


" . .. speaking as I
think, I die, I die," Emilia's last words are to placed by her mistress's side.  She has
given her life to exonerate Desdemona.

At the funeral speech, how did Marc Antony explain that Caesar was not "ambitious"?

In Act 3.2 of Shakespeare's Julius
Caesar
, Antony juxtaposes (places in opposition) an unambitious act performed
by Caesar, with a refrain about Brutus's (or the other conspirators') belief that Caesar
was ambitious and about Brutus (or the other conspirators) being honorable men.  I'll
put it in bullets:


  • Caesar did an unambitious
    act

  • But Brutus says he was
    ambitious

  • And Brutus is an honorable
    man

Here's an example from Antony's speech,
with the quotes in bullets:


  • I thrice presented
    him a kingly crown,/Which he did thrice refuse.  Was this
    ambition?

  • Yet Brutus says he was
    ambitious,

  • And sure he is an honorable man.  (Act
    3.2.105-108)

Antony uses irony to persuade the
crowd that Caesar was not ambitious and was therefore assassinated unjustly, because he
earlier promises Brutus that he will not directly say anything negative about the
conspirators.  He, therefore, says only positive things about the conspirators, but the
juxtaposition of Caesar's unambitious acts with those positive things, creates
irony. 


And it also creates a mob that riots through Rome
looking to kill the conspirators.

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

What is a metaphor used in Tuesdays with Morrie?What is 1 metaphor used in Tuesdays with Morrie? Page number is needed and the metaphor must be...

My favorite metaphor in Tuesdays with
Morrie
is the story above the wave.  It's a metaphor that uses part-to-whole.
 Waves are the part; the ocean is the whole.  The story is analogous to humans who
mistakenly think their deaths are the end of life.


Morrie
compares humans to waves.  A wave may think it is going to die when it crashes on the
beach.  It doesn't realize that it's part of the
ocean.


Most humans, in their linear thinking and
self-absorded lives, think they are headed one-way alone toward death.  Little do they
realize that they live on in the memory (ocean) of others.  In other words, a human is
part of humanity, and even though we may physically die, humanity lives
on.



"Okay. 
The story is about a little wave, bobbing along in the ocean, having a grand old time. 
He's enjoying the wind and the fresh air -- until he notices the other waves in front of
him, crashing against the shore


" 'My God, this is
terrible,' the wave says.  'Look what's going to happen to
me!'


"Then along comes another wave.  It sees the first
wave, looking grim, and it says to him, 'Why do you look so
sad?'


"The first wave says, 'You don't understand!  We're
all going to crash!  All of us waves are going to be nothing!  Isn't it
terrible?'


"The second wave says, 'No,
you don't understand.  You're not a wave, you're part of the
ocean.' "


In 1984, what does Winston think about love and loyalty from the dream he has about the paperweight in Part 2 Chapter 7?

The moving dream that Winston has in this chapter shows us
the true conditions of the time when Big Brother was establishing his power base and the
resulting hunger and general want that his citizens suffered. His memory of stealing the
small bit of chocolate that his mother insisted belonged to his sister and running away
shows his guilt about the disappearance of his mother and sister. Reflecting on his
mother, Winston thinks about her private standards and how they bestowed upon her a kind
of "nobility" and "purity." Note what he learns about love and loyalty from this
memory:



If
you loved someone, you loved him, and when you had nothing else to give, you still gave
him love. When the last of the chocolate was gone, his mother had clasped the child in
her arms. It was no use, it changed nothing, it did not produce more chocolate, it did
not avert the child's death or her own; but it seemed natural to her to do
it.



Love is an instinctive
response, that, Winston reflects, has been bred out of life by the Party and Big
Brother. Love is something that is always there and can always be offered, even when
nothing else remains.

Who said the following lines and why? a. "is she a Capulet? O dear account, my life is my foe's debt." and b. b. "My only love sprung from my...

At the Capulet's ball, Romeo asks the nurse about Juliet's
identity and he is distraught at hearing that she is a Capulet, sworn enemy to the
Montagues, Romeo's family. There exists an age-old feud between the two
houses.


Romeo uses an accounting metaphor: by mentioning a
"dear account" he suggests that there is a high price to pay for being in love with
one's enemy.


"My life is my foe's debt" implies that
Romeo's life is now in his enemy's hands. Whatever account there is to settle will
be paid for with his life - this foreshadows his tragic death later. Furthermore, it
also suggests that his life will be controlled by his enemy. He will forever be at
Juliet's command for he loves her. She will be master of his fate and the paradox is
that she is, at once, also his enemy being the daughter of his family's sworn
opposition. Furthermore, his enemy, in this sense, Juliet, owes him his life - she gives
him a reason to live for he is overwhelmed by his love for
her. 


The nurse later tells Juliet who Romeo is and she
too, overwhelmed by the information, comments about her 'only love' which has found its
source in her 'only hate'. This means that the one person whom she truly loves is also a
member of the one family that she has been taught to hate. She loves no other and she
hates no one else. This once again presents a paradox: how does one love and hate the
same person at the same time?


Juliet expresses her dismay
by observing that she had seen (or fallen in love with Romeo) "too early", i.e. before
she knew who he really was and she only discovered his true identity when it was "too
late". Her love for him could not be undone despite the fact that he was supposed to be
a member of her family's sworn enemy.  

Monday, January 28, 2013

prove that (x/(x+1)+1):(1-3x^2/(1-x^2))=(1-x)/(1-2x)

We have to prove that
(x/(x+1)+1):(1-3x^2/(1-x^2))=(1-x)/(1-2x)


Starting with the
left hand
side


(x/(x+1)+1):(1-3x^2/(1-x^2))


=>
[(x/(x+1)+1)]/[(1-3x^2/(1-x^2))]


=>
[(x+x+1)/(x+1)]/[(1-x^2-3x^2)/(1-x^2)]


=>
[(2x+1)/(x+1)]/[(1-4x^2)/(1-x^2)]


=>
[(2x+1)/(x+1)]/[(1-2x)(1+2x)/(1-x)(1+x)]


=>
[(2x+1)(1-x)(1+x)/(x+1)(1-2x)(1+2x)]


=>
[(1-x)/(1-2x)]


which is the right hand
side


This proves that
(x/(x+1)+1):(1-3x^2/(1-x^2))=(1-x)/(1-2x)

Please help me compare and contrast Absurdism and Existentialism.I am writing a paper about The Stranger by Albert Camus and i have come to the...

I am not a philosopher, but I will try to simplify
it.



Existentialism is the belief that life only
has meaning in relation to the individual person – his emotions and thoughts. Also, it
is the individual who is responsible for giving his life meaning in spite of all the
opposing forces that get in the way – boredom, alienation, etc. Most existentialists did
not believe in a higher power but those that did believed God may have created man, but
then he left man to his own devices. There are lots of varying degrees to this belief,
so this is a simplification.


Absurdism is a more extreme
philosophy. Absurdism is the belief that there is no meaning to life, or no meaning in
the universe, so that man’s attempts to search for such meaning are “absurd” because
that meaning does not exist. Some absurdists believe in a slightly different view, that
there IS meaning, but that man cannot find it, and the only thing that gives meaning to
life is absurdism itself and that man should embrace the fact that life is absurd if he
wants to survive. This was the view of Camus. He believed man should embrace the absurd
and live in spite of it. If man could do this, this was all he could hope for in
life.


Pretty grim stuff. This philosophy was in many ways
an outgrowth of the pessimism inflicted upon the world after two horrific world wars
that left footprints of hopelessness on the world.


If you
do some research, you can define these terms even further.

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Why does O'Brien insist that war stories are not moral, and why does he try to reconsrtuct what Lemon must have experienced the moment of his...

In The Things They Carried, O'Brien
gives the recipe for "How to Tell a True War Story" by saying the stomach should believe
it.  It must pack an emotional wallup.  If it doesn't, it comes across as manufactured,
invented, moralistic, political.  It becomes a lie by becoming something else--an
abstraction, a polemic, a sermon--not a story.  A war story is a love story.  It brings
back loving memories.  It resurrects friendly
ghosts.


O'Brien's thesis for the book
is:



I want you
to feel what I felt. I want you to know why story-truth is truer sometimes than
happening-truth (O'Brien
179).



So, O'Brien says that
true war stories need to be light on  facts (logos) and morality
(ethos).  Instead, they must be visceral and brutal and gory and
full of cussing (pathos).  That's the way soldiers talk.  That's
their style.  And it's been this way since Trojan war
mythology.


First of all, war is absurd.  It does not
operate according to ethical, moral, or religious rules.  Bullets are indiscriminate.
 During war, a soldier or storyteller does not have time to moralize.  Morality and war
don't mix.


Remember woman at the reading?  She wanted a
moral or a lesson or some kind of redeeming meaning by the end of the story he read.
 She didn't understand that the story itself is the lesson.  She didn't understand that
it was a love story.


A good story doesn't preach: it's
morals are implicit, if there are any at all.  To the “dumb cooze” audience reading
O'Brien's novel for realistic depictions of war and conventional storytelling his thesis
is a betrayal, not a paradox; O'Brien, to these readers, comes across as weak,
dishonest, one so full of regret that he rejects the traditionally masculine-defined
rules of engagement in both war (“kill or be killed”) and storytelling (unreliable
narrator).


Lemon's death becomes a funny and beautiful
thing.  He reconstructs the memory by draining the focus on death from it.  He drains
the horror from it.  If a soldier and storyteller can do that, then he can open up new
perspectives that are, ironically, both beautiful and funny.

i want to play boy george im a girl people say no should i be-alive in my own self

The public persona, Boy George, was born with the name
George Alan O'Dowd in 1961 in South London, England. He is rather eccentric in the way
he looks and dresses, and is instantly noticeable as an original personality. His looks
are very much the outward, visual expression of a very musically creative individual.
Along with this creativity, however, numerous person problems, especially his addiction
to drugs, have made life, at times, quite difficult and problematic for Boy
George.


When you say that you want to "play Boy George,"
what  do you mean? Do you want to dress like him? That shouldn't be much of a problem
because he dressed a lot like a girl. It may be somewhat difficult to be a girl who
plays a boy who dresses like a girl, but it's been done before. Ever see the movie
"Victor Victoria?"


The question, though, is why do you want
to play someone else, other than in a play, or in a movie? Boy George is an original;
he's his own invention. Perhaps you would be better off discovering and developing your
own, unique self... tap into the source of your own creativity. Rather than trying to be
like someone else, discover, enhance, and be proud of who you are. An original is always
better and more respected than an imitation.

Saturday, January 26, 2013

What quotes from Ibsen's play, A Doll's House, express Nora Helmer's internal thoughts and emotions?

In Henrik Ibsen's play A Doll's
House
, there are several places where Nora reveals her feelings and
thoughts.


At the end of Act One, when Torvald says that
people that go wrong young in life are generally children of chronic liars, we learn
that Nora is afraid that her presence will poison her children because of the lies she
has had to tell to save Torvald's life. Torvald has left the room and Anne-Marie wants
to bring the children in, as they are begging to see their
mother:



No,
no, no  don't let them in to me!...Hurt my children—! Poison my home? That's not true.
Never. Never in all the
world.



When Krogstad finally
tells Nora that he will expose the lie she has hidden as to where she received the money
to take Torvald to Italy, Nora dreads the event. She believes
so completely in Torvald's love for her that she plans her own
suicide so that he will not be tempted to take the blame onto himself to protect
her.


Toward the end of Act Three, Nora imagines her
suicide, freezing in the black water, never again to see her husband or
children:


readability="16">

Never see him again. Never, never. Never see the
children either—them, too. Never, never. Oh, the freezing black water! The depths—down—
Oh, I wish it were over— He has it now; he's reading it—now. Oh no, no, not yet.
Torvald, good-bye, you and the
children...



When Torvald
comes out of his office, he is ranting with fury, and still she believes he will protect
her by taking the blame. This perception is quickly
obliterated.


readability="8">

...Let me go! Let me out!...Don't try to save me,
Torvald....It's true. I've loved you more than all this world...Just let me loose.
You're not not going to suffer for my sake. You're not going to take on my
guilt.



Torvald's
response:



No
more playacting. You stay right here and give me a reckoning. You understand what you've
done? Answer! You
understand?



Nora is finally
opening her eyes to see not what she thought was or
would be there, but the reality that has been
there through their entire marriage:


readability="7">

(The stage direction says that Nora is
"looking squarely at him, her face hardening.")  Yes. I'm beginning
to understand everything
now.



It is as this very
moment that Nora knows that although her life has been about her
husband and her children, her life has had nothing to do with
her. She is further enlightened when Torvald tells her she will
never be allowed near the children
again...until Krogstad's second note assures him that the details
will never go public. Torvald is relieved, but Nora knows she can no longer live with
this stranger, and so she leaves Torvald at the end of the play.

In Frankenstein, why does Victor proceed with his plans to marry Elizabeth?...despite the monster’s earlier threat to visit him on his wedding...

After receiving Elizabeth's letter in which she asks him
"Do you not love another?" because Victor no longer shows an interest in marrying her,
Victor's memory of what the creature has told him is revived --"I shall be with you on
your wedding-night."  Victor believes, of course, that his "daemon" will destroy him and
prevent him from what little happiness he can attain by having Elizabeth's love to
console him for all his losses.  However, Victor resolves, "Well, be it so," deciding to
marry Elizabeth and have what little joy he can before his inevitable death.  At least,
with his death Victor can finally achieve some peace.


In
addition, Victor feels that if he marries Elizabeth, he can end her misery and give her
some happiness, if only for a brief time:  "Yet I would die to make her happy." 
Besides, Victor reasons, if the creature believes that he has postponed his wedding out
of fear, the "monster" will merely devise another plan that is even more dreadful, for
Victor's torture and destruction. So, Victor resolves to agree to his union with
Elizabeth in order to bring happiness to her as well as to his
father. 


Here again Victor engages in rationalizing his
situation and his future actions.  While he deludes himself into thinking that he wishes
to make his father and Elizabeth happy, Victor chiefly deceives himself by attributing
all the evil machinations to the creature.

Friday, January 25, 2013

Which is the domain of (x^2-3x+2)^1/2?

The domain of sqrt(x^2-3x+2) is formed from the xalues of
x for the expression sqrt(x^2-3x+2) is defined.


To find the
domain of sqrt(x^2-3x+2), we must impose the constraint
(x^2-3x+2)>0.


To solve the inequality, we'll
factorize the quadratic expression:


x^2-3x+2 = x^2 - x - 2x
+ 2 = 0


We'll factorize the first 2 terms and the next 2
terms, so that:


x(x-1) - 2(x-1) =
0


We'll factorize again and we'll
obtain:


(x-1)(x-2)=0


We'll set
each factor eqaul to
0.


x-1=0


x=1


x-2=0


x=2


After
finding the zeros, we have to test the signs over the 3
intervals:


(-inf,1), (1,2), (2,
inf).


We'll choose values from each interval and thest the
sign:


For x=0, in interval
(-inf,1).


sqrt(0^2-3*0+2) =
sqrt2>0


For x=1.5, in interval
(1,2)


sqrt(1.5^2-3*1.5+2)=sqrt(2.25 - 4.5 + 2)=sqrt(-0.25)
undefined


For x=3, in interval (2,
inf)


sqrt(3^2-3*3+2)=
sqrt2>0


After testing, we can establish the
domain:


Because of the fact that the expression is defined
for values of x in the intervals (-inf,1) or (2, inf) and undefined for values of x in
the interval (1,2), the domain will
be:


Domain: (-inf,1] U [2,
inf)


Note: The symbol "U"
means reunion of
intervals.


We've included also
the values x=1 and x=2, because they are the zeros of the expression
sqrt(3^2-3*3+2).

Thursday, January 24, 2013

What do horses symbolize in All the Pretty Horses?

Cormac McCarthy's great Western novel All the
Pretty Horses
uses horses to symbolize manhood.
 Typically in the old West, guns were the definition of a man.  But here, it's a man's
horse:



Finally
he said that among men there was no such communion as among horses and the
notion that men
can be understood at all was probably an
illusion.



Whereas Jimmy
Blevins kills another man to get his gun back, John Grady risks his life to go back into
Mexico to recover his horse.  Remember when Lacey and John keep asking if Jimmy stole
his horse?  They don't believe it's his, just as they don't believe he's a real man.  In
the end, they're right: he is kid attempting to be a
man.


Early in a man's life, his horse is young and
wild.



As he
was drifting to sleep his thoughts were of horses and of the open country and of horses.
Horses still wild on the mesa who'd never seen a man afoot
and who knew nothing of him or his life yet in whose souls he would come to reside
forever.



But as a man comes
into his own so does his horse.  It's not a horse, it's HIS horse.  He trained it.  He
branded it.  He pilots it.  It is his identity and
manhood:



But
there were two things they agreed upon wholly and that were never spoken and that was
that God had put horses on earth to work cattle and that other than cattle there was no
wealth proper to a
man.


What are some of the main themes of Paradise by Toni Morrison?

One of the themes in Paradise by Toni
Morrison relates to the title of the novel, a novel about different perspectives of what
constitutes safety and safe harbor. For one group of people, safety and safe harbor (or
paradise) is what for another group of people constitutes a threat to their way of life
and existence. In Morrison's Paradise, the only apparent resolution
to this dilemma of conflicting points of view upon what constitutes safety is egregious
violence.


One theme that Morrison is presenting, a theme
that may in itself be as controversial as the points of view presented within her novel,
is that paradise has to be fought for--safe harbor can only be won through fighting
opponents, as there will always be opponents to one's version of, one's view of
paradise--first to gain paradise and then to protect and keep paradise. Another theme is
that the attainment of paradise, of one's safe harbor (for which one must paradoxically
submit one's self to the unsafety of unending violent fighting) requires at least a
periodic suspension of logic and reason and at least a periodic confidence in mysticism
and illogicality.

effect of changing b on graph of f(x)=ax^2+bx+c

When the value of b in the quadratic function y = ax^2 +
bx + c is changed, the graph's shape remains the same, only its position
changes.


The graph opens upwards or downwards depending on
the sign of a. The sign of b has no effect on that. The concavity of the graph is also
not affected by the value of b. There is just a shift in the position of the graph which
may be upwards, downwards, to the left or to the right. The new graph is located such
that the roots of the equation are located at the appropriate location on the
x-axis.


You can use the link provided below to enter
functions with different values of b and see the changes due to
it.


A change in b only results in a movement
of the graph with respect to the x and y axes.

Describe the hardships that Americans faced during the Great Depression. Using historical evidence and examples from the film “Cinderella Man”.

The story of James Braddock is heavily laden with
hardships faced during the Depression.  In the opening scene, the Braddock family does
not have much to eat, as economic stress has placed its grip on the family unit.  When
their child asks for more food, Jimmy concocts a story how in his dream he had a huge
steak with George Raft and other Hollywood celebrities and "was stuffed."  At the same
time, Mae, Braddock's wife, has to dilute the milk with water in order to maximize its
use.  There are other realities conveyed through the film, as well.  When Braddock lines
up at the docks for work, the foreman asks for "five" or needs "ten" workers out of a
field of hundreds who clamor at the gate for a shot at a day's work.  While working on
the dock one day, Mike, a friend of Jimmy, notices his broken hand while working and
tells him in a heartbreaking manner, "I need this job, man."  Finally, when Jimmy's son
talks of friends being sent away because of financial hardship, James looks at his son,
dead on, and says that he is not sending his child away.  Probably the best and most
telling aspect of the life of the Great Depression would be when Braddock agrees to
fighting Max Baer, Heavyweight champion of the world.  When explaining why he feels no
fear, Braddock argues that when working people have to struggle and, in cases like
Mike's, die for work, for money, for a job, little else can be feared as Jimmy argues
working on the docks is far worse than anything Baer can throw at
him.

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Dicuss why the theme of "Money cannot buy happiness" in The Great Gatsby makes it a great piece of American fiction.Please answer in detail and...

Concerning The Great Gatsby, you
should be careful of looking for simple, easy one-liners in sophisticated fiction. 
Human existence is complex, not simple, and sophisticated fiction usually reflects
that.


For instance, in this novel, money is only a means to
an end for Gatsby.  He doesn't strive to become wealthy because of greed.  He strives to
become wealthy for the sake of winning Daisy back.  Money only matters to Gatsby because
he thinks it will help him win Daisy back.  An easy one-liner about money not buying
happiness doesn't apply to Gatsby.  Daisy will bring happiness to Gatsby, nothing else. 
That is the issue.


For another example, Tom is definitely
leading a happy life, so to speak.  He has a beautiful wife, doesn't have to work as far
as the reader knows, and has a girlfriend, too.  And he wins in the end.  He is so sure
of himself and so ignorant that he thinks he's always right and enjoys the winning.  He
has what he wants and gets what he wants.  If one wants to apply one-liners to the
novel, one could argue that the novel suggests that money can buy
happiness.  A reader's judgments concerning Tom do not take away from the fact that Tom
is happy with his situation and his life. 


The corruption
of the American Dream is at issue in the novel, as are one's ability or inability to
recapture the past, illusion, and other issues.  But saying that the novel shows that
money can't buy happiness is too moralistic and too easy and too
simplistic.

How does photosynthesis follow the law of conservation of mass and the law of conservation of energy?Explain in detail.

Photosynthesis separate carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere
in to oxygen and carbon, using the sunlight. Thus Photo synthesis  absorbs of heat or
light energy that is contained in sunlight. In this way the inputs to the photosynthesis
process are carbon-dioxide and light energy, and the outputs are Oxygen and carbon.
Oxygen is released in the atmosphere while the carbon is used up in making food for the
plants.


The amount of oxygen and carbon atoms released by
photosynthesis are exactly equal to the atoms of these material contained in
carbon-dioxide converted. In this way photosynthesis has conserved the mass or material,
and in this way followed the law of conservation of
mass.


Photo synthesis also follows the law of conservation
of energy. The energy of sunlight used in the process of photosynthesis is absorbed by
the molecules of carbon-dioxide before they can separate in carbon and oxygen molecules.
This absorbed energy is present in the carbon and oxygen molecules and can be releases
again as energy of combustion produced when carbon and oxygen combine to produce carbon
dioxide.

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

What ideas must people first accept before such a totalitarian society (such as the one in Anthem) can take hold?

To allow a totalitarian state based on absolute
collectivism, the people must first be willing to completely give up personal/individual
freedom. Rand’s novella is an allegory. If such a state were to exist, it would probably
not be as exaggerated as it is in Rand’s novella. But, for the sake of argument, if this
were to happen, there would have to be a government-enforced policy to eliminate the
concept of individuality. This would have to take place in every institution: certainly
in education, economics and politics.


People must also
accept the idea that all activities must be performed for the society as a whole.
Therefore, there would be no actions which benefit only one person. This would be a
drastic revision of all aspects of how humans think about themselves and their
community.


Capitalism would be gone. There would be no
private property because there could be nothing owned by one person. Each person would
have to accept the idea, as a reality, that he/she does everything for everyone. In
other words, he/she never does anything for “one”
other.


Monogamy would also be gone because no individuals
can perform actions which are geared towards just one individual. Everything would have
a social aspect. Nothing would have a personal aspect. People would have to accept that
individuality is so inferior to communal interests, that individuality is rendered
existentially pointless and morally corrupt.

In The Great Gatsby, how long were Daisy and Gatsby together before he went to war?

The novel has a number of indicators which give us some
idea of how long Daisy and Jay were together, but there is a confusing
contradiction.


In chapter four, Jordan Baker tells Nick
about the occasion when she had first seen Daisy and Jay in each other's
company:



"When
I came opposite her house that morning her white roadster was beside the curb, and she
was sitting in it with a lieutenant I had never seen before. They were so engrossed in
each other that she didn’t see me until I was five feet
away."



The fact that they
were, "engrossed in each other" implies that they were in some sort of relationship
already. We can assume that this happened during Fall of
1917
, since Jordan specifically mentions the event occurring in October
1917.


The next date she mentions is the
following year
:


readability="8">

"By the next year I
had a few beaux myself, and I began to play in tournaments, so I didn’t see Daisy very
often."



She adds
that:



"Wild
rumors were circulating about her — how her mother had found her packing her bag
one winter night to go to New York and say good-by to a
soldier who was going
overseas."



Based on the
above, we can assume that Jay and Daisy had been involved since fall of 1917 and parted
ways (when he left for the war) in the winter of 1918. This must mean that they had been
acquainted for at least three months -
October 1917 through to January 1918
(depending obviously, on the
specific dates). It could even have been four months. 


The
detail provided in chapter eight, however, contradicts what Jordan says. Jay had been
telling Nick about his relationship with Daisy and Nick mentions
that:



" ...he
took Daisy one still October night, took her because he had
no real right to touch her
hand."



In this, it is clear
that their relationship began in October. The contradiction
lies in what Nick says later:


readability="9">

"On the last afternoon before he went abroad, he
sat with Daisy in his arms for a long, silent time. It was a cold fall
day
,"



Also:


readability="6">

"They had never been closer in
their month of love
,
...



This clearly suggests
that they had been together for a
month


F. Scott Fitzgerald might have
intentionally created this contrast to indicate the fragility of what we assume to know:
it is all a matter of perception and recall. 

For the following production estimates, what is the amount to be spent on buying raw material in July.Estimated inventory (units), July 1:...

According to the production estimates for July, the
company's inventory as on July 1 is 8500 units. It  requires this to increase and the
inventory to be 10500 units on July 31. This means that an excess 2000 units need to be
manufactured in addition to the units that are sold. The sale for the month of July is
76000. So a total of 76000 + 2000 = 78000 units need to be
produced.


Each unit requires 3 units of material A and half
a pound of material B. Material A costs $5 per unit, so 3 units cost $15. As half a
pound of material B is required $9 has to be spent here. There is no raw material in
store and all of it has to be bought in July.


So the amount
to be spent to buy material A is 78000*15 = $1170000. The amount to be spent to buy
material B is 78000*9 = $702000


The correct
amount to be spent for A is $1170000 and the amount to be spent for material B is
$702000.

Monday, January 21, 2013

What literary element is "Shakespeare is hard"? What literary element does this sentence have an example of: "On the pallid bust of Pallas,...

I'll add the following to your
answer. 


Pallid and Pallas do create alliteration with the
"p" sound, and they also provide repetition and unity with the use of assonance:  the
repetition of vowel sounds (short "a" sounds, in this case).  They do not constitute
internal rhyme, because they do not rhyme:  the final syllables are not identical and do
not sound the same.  Variations of true rhyme do exist, but -id and -as in the final
syllables do not fit into any category of
rhyme.


"Shakespeare is hard," I believe, is an example of
synecdoche:  naming a whole for its part.  "Shakespeare" means "reading Shakespeare." 
Shakespeare, the person, is not literally hard.  Reading him can be.  I'm not entirely
sure about this, but the figurative language being used seems to involve naming. 
Another editor may be more certain.


Finally, I believe
"wind with a wolf's head" is simply metaphor.  The wind is being compared to the head of
a wolf.  The wind is the tenor of the metaphor (what the writer wants to describe), and
the wolf's head is the vehicle (what the writer uses to describe the tenor).  There is
an obvious comparison, and neither like or as is used, which would make it a simile. 
Instead, the comparison is direct, which makes the line a
metaphor.   

Give an analysis of the funeral orations in Act III of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare.

Act III, Scene ii, in Julius Caesar
by William Shakespeare includes the funeral speeches by Brutus and Antony.  There have
been conditions established in which Antony has to follow during his speech honoring
Caesar. 


These are the
provisions:


  • Brutus will speak
    first.

  • Antony will speak in the same place as
    Brutus.

  • Antony will not blame the conspirators but only
    say the good about Caesar. 

  • Tell the people that he is
    doing it with the permission of the
    conspirators.

Brutus begins his
oration. 


Since Brutus is a stoic, his primary appeal is
logos explaining why Caesar had to die; furthermore, he depends on his ethics or
character to win over the audience. He does use some pathos to indicate that he loved
Caesar as a friend; however, his logic exceeds his emotional
appeal.


This is his
contention:


Brutus loved Rome more than he
loved Caesar.


His supporting
points


If Caesar lived, the Roman people would
have become slaves.


Choose: Caesar alive and Romans slaves
or Caesar dead and Romans free.


  • Caesar’s
    love-Brutus weeps

  • Caesar’s bravery-Brutus honors
    him.

  • Caesar’s good luck-Brutus applauds
    him.

  • Caesar’s ambition-Brutus killed
    him.

One of the rhetorical devices
that Brutus uses is repetition.  He says the same thing but either reverses the order or
uses slightly different words.


Have I offended
any person? Freeman/Roman


Caesar was killed for his
offenses.  Brutus would expect the same punishment.  


If
the Romans require death from Brutus, he will use the same dagger that he used to kill
Caesar.



Antony will follow the provisos of the
conspirators.  


Rhetorical devices used by
Antony


Repetition, humility,
grief, shock, sarcasm, pathos, ethos,
logos


Antony calls to the crowd as though he is
their equal:  Friends, Romans, Country men


Throughout his
speech, Antony will use the words of Brutus to reinforce his points: ambition,
ambitious, noble, honorable, honor.
He initially uses them just as he
promised Brutus that he would.  As the speech progresses, his tone becomes more and more
sarcastic toward the assassins.


Antony states his purpose:
He is there to bury Caesar.  He is not
going
to bring up all of the good things that Caesar did. Of course, he then
proceeds to list the good things that Caesar had done for
Rome.


  • Brought captives which made ransoms and
    money for Rome

  • Caesar cried for the
    poor.

  • Caesar refused the crown three
    times.

He asks the audience two
questions:


  • Does this sound like Caesar was
    ambitious?

  • Why do the Romans not mourn Caesar that they
    loved only yesterday?

Antony appears overcome
with grief and pauses.  This is a ploy to allow the mob time to think about
what Antony has said so far.


He describes his
purported feelings about the
assassins. 


readability="10">

Good friends, let me not stir you
up


To such a sudden flood of
mutiny


They that have done this deed are
honorable.



Antony
brings out Caesar’s will to tease the crowd.  Then he puts it away for the
present.


He describes the conspirators
taking souvenirs from the body
of Caesar: they took his blood and hair for
memorabilia and to leave their children.


Antony
uses the body of Caesar
to point out the thirty five stab wounds that were
made. He lists all of the conspirators and ascribes a wound to each
one.


Finally, the crowd makes Antony read the
will
which provides money and recreational areas for the Roman
Citizens. 


The Crowd is now hysterical. Now a mob---they
leave to cremate Caesar and to kill the conspirators.

Discuss the differences in the way that Napoleon and Snowball interact with the other animals in Orwell's Animal Farm.

"Animal Farm" is an allegory for the Russian Revolution
and the betrayal of the revolution by Stalin and the Communist Party
bureaucracy.


Orwell was a revolutionary who supported the
idea of a state run in the interests of workers - he fought in the Spanish Civil war. He
is sympathetic to the Russian Revolution, but critical of its
degradation.


After the Revolution in 1917, Russian society
was organised around workers councils (or Soviets). Soviets provided democratic
structures in which people debated and implemented the running and organisation of
society. The leadership of each soviet was elected by members. After October, the CP
dominated the soviets having won support in 1917.


The CP
comprised local branches, with a central committee running the party day-to-day. The
party congress elected the central committee, and comprised delegates elected by
branches.


Congress was the supreme decision-making body of
the party; the CC made decisions between congress.


Lenin
was the leader, practical and theoretical, of the CP. Two other key figures were Joseph
Stalin and Leon Trotsky.


Stalin was a bureaucrat within the
CP machinery. During 1917 he was editor of Pravda - the party's newspaper - and
subsequently rose to become General Secretary.


Trotsky was
a journalist and theoretician, who wrote on Russian, and international, affairs. In 1917
he was elected Chair of the Petrograd soviet, led the October uprising, was elected as
the Commissar of Foreign Affairs, and also led the Red
Army.


Trotsky argued for the need to export the revolution
internationally, and that, without this, Russia would degrade into a
bureaucracy.


Stalin opposed Trotsky, arguing to build
socialism first in Russia, and only then to export
it.


Through the early 1920s, Trotsky challenged Stalin and
his supporters through the "left opposition", advocating greater openess and
democracy.


Trotsky believed in workers' democracy, while
Stalin believed in the supremacy of the party (and its leadership) in decision-making.
Stalin, after Lenin's death, made the CC, and not congress, the supreme body,
effectively subordinating the party membership to its
CC.


Trotsky, by the 1930s, described Russia as a degraded
workers state - it was undemocratic but still functioning on the basis of a planned
economy.


Here lies the answer to your question. In the
book, Snowball is analogous to Trotsky; Napolean to
Stalin.


Snowball advocates elected, decision-making
committees, but Napolean opposes these.


Snowball encourages
the animals to engage with decision making, and to educate themselves. Napolean, by
contrast, insists on delegation of responsibility to the pigs, while the animals do the
hard labour.


Napolean deceives the animals, operates behind
closed doors, and secrelty trains the dogs.


Snowball
proposes the windmill to reduce work on the farm. Napolean opposes this, and after
chasing Snowball off the farm, claims it to be his
idea.


Snowball seeks to win animals over to his ideas
through debate; Napolean seeks to force animals to his ideas through deception and the
dog-army.


Finally, Napolean's attitude is that of the pigs
as a whole (excluding Snowball). Snowball's struggle is against the pigs in general, and
not just Napolean. The pigs develop their own set of interests, which separate them from
the other animals. So the pigs act increasingly to further their own position, against
the interests of the animals as a whole.


This is the
essence of the Stalinisation of the CP, and of Russia.

What are some thesis statements for A Rose for Emily?

In order to write good literary thesis statements, you
need to consider two things: what choices does an author make, and how do those choices
contribute to the meaning of the work.  Choices worth consideration in this novel
include: the stream-of-consciousness narrator, by a third person narrator, who is of a
younger generation of townspeople in comparison to Miss Emily; the five section
structural divisions; the symbolism of things such as the house, her watch, and the
sidewalks and house numbers, characterization of Miss Emily, her father, and Homer; the
title of the story; selection of detail; and other figurative
language.


Next you need to consider Faulkner's themes.  The
story is about love and unrequited love, decay and death, murder, the generation gap,
the history of the South, loneliness and isolation.


In
order to write the thesis statement you need to think about what Faulkner is trying to
say about the theme.  What is he saying about love?  The story illustrates the extremes
that someone may be driven to in the face of the "loveless" life that Miss Emily's
father created for her by driving all of her potential suitors.  What is Faulkner saying
about the generation gap?  Miss Emily represents the standards and attitudes of the old
south, and her inability to accept the changes of the new generation, leaving her even
more isolated than ever.  Your essay would then discuss the specific literary choices
that Faulkner makes to bring the theme to life.

What are some character traits that Laertes has?Hamlet by William Shakespeare Please provide proof and cite lines for the character trait you choose

While Laertes is bold and rash as he crashes into
Elsinore, calling Claudius "O thou vile king! (V,i,116), and while he is gullible in
believing Claudius's intention are for Laertes to avenge himself against Hamlet, Laertes
does have some redeeming characteristics.


For instance,
just before Laertes wounds Hamlet with the rapier whose tip has been poisoned, he has a
twinge of conscience as in an aside he says, "And yet it is almost against my conscience
(V,ii,296).  Then, as he and Hamlet lie dying, Laertes asks Hamlet to forgive him as he
forgives Hamlet:


readability="13">

Exchange forgiveness with me, noble
Hamlet


Mine and my father's death come not upon
thee,


'Nor thine on me! (V,ii,
308-310)



And, perhaps the
most redeeming trait of Laertes is his devotion and love for his sister.  To Ophelia,
Laertes gives sound advice when he learns that she loves Hamlet, cautioning her to
remember that he is Prince of Denmark and may have to marry someone else, and to be
careful with her affections:


readability="55">

...Perhaps he loves you
now,


And now no soil nor cautel doth
besmirch


The virtue of his will, but you must
fear,


His greatess weighed, his will is not his
own,


For he himself is subject to his
birth.


He may not, as unvalued persons
do,


Carve for himself, for on his choice
depends


The safety and health of this whole
state,


And therefore must his choice be
circumscribed


Unton the voice and yielding of that
body


Whereof he is the head.  Then if he says he loves
you,


It fits your wisdom so far to believe
it....[But]


If with too credent ear you list his
songs,


Or lose your heart, or your chaste treasure
open


To his unmastered
importunity.


Fear it, Ophelia, fear it, my dear
sister,


And keep you in the rear of your affection.
(I,iii,14-34)



That he loves
his sister dearly is also evidenced when Laertes jumps into her
grave:



Lay
her i' th'earth,


And from her fair and unpolluted
flesh


May violets spring!  I tell thee, churlish
priest,


A minist'ring angel shall my sister
be


When thou liest howling
(V,i,208-212)



Impetuous and
at times rather foolish, Laertes is, nevertheless, forgiving and
loving.




Sunday, January 20, 2013

In Antigone, what are Creon's principles?

Interesting question. By "principles," I assume you are
referring to his values or morales which dictate how he acts and what he says and does.
One of Creon's first speeches directly refers to his "principles," which also explains
why he has refused to allow the body of Polynices to receive proper burial. Note what he
says:



These
are my principles. Never at my hands


will the traitor be
honoured above the patriot.


But whoever proves his loyalty
to the state--


I'll prize that man in death as well as
life.



Of course, herein lies
the conflict of the play, as he ignores the "unwritten laws" that Antigone insists must
be upheld by giving her brother proper burial. We can therefore infer that Creon's
"principles" involve clinging on to power, whatever the cost, and harshly punishing any
form of rebellion, even if that brings him into contact with his own family or the Gods.
Creon, by clinging firmly to his principles throughout the play, therefore sows the
seeds of his own destruction and in the end loses everything. He remains an important
lesson for any would be despot about the dangers of authoritarian
power.

Saturday, January 19, 2013

In the book Of Mice and Men what is a trait and a quote of the character Candy the old swamper? A quote and a trait

Candy, the old swamper who has lost his hand in an
accident, is a rather tragic character as he fears that soon, like his old dog, he will
outlive his usefulness.  When George Milton and Lennie Small first arrive on the ranch
and are taken to the bunkhouse, Candy--like his dog would be--is cautious as he talks to
the two new men.  He eludes the questions that George asks about the small yellow can
that contains lice poison: 


readability="6">

I don't know....Tell you what--last guy that had
thiss bed was a blacksmith--hell of a nice fella and as clean a guy as you want to
meet.  Used to wash his hands even after he
ate.



Candy does not want the
men to leave for fear that the boss will attribute their departure to something he may
have said.


Later in Steinbeck's Of Mice and
Men
, warmed and strengthened by the friendship of Lennie and George, and
hopeful of joining them in the purchase of some land on which he can live out his life,
Candy becomes emboldened.  He is quick to insult Curley's wife as he tries to repel her;
he knows she is trouble and wants to keep her from endangering Lennie's and George's
positions on the ranch.


When Curley's wife, "heavily made
up," comes to the barn where Lennie and Candy are with
Crooks,


readability="6">

'Curley aint been here,' Candy said
sourly.



After she refuses to
leave, Candy becomes angered.  As he rubs the stump of his wrist on his
knee,



he said
accusingly, ' You gotta husband'.  You got no call foolin' aroun' with other guys,
causin' trouble.'



When she
asks the men what has happened to Curley's hand, it is Candy who seeks again to protect
his new friends.  He says, in a much more polite
tone,


readability="6">

'Why...Curley...he got his han' caught in a
machine, ma'am.  Bust his
han'.'



After she laughs,
Candy repeats his statement "sullenly" this
time.


Interestingly, Candy's behavior is much like that of
a stray dog.  He is lonely and wants to be accepted; at first, he is very cautious, then
when shown love, he becomes loyal and protective.  But, faced with a formidable adversay
such as Curley's wife, he backs down some and is submissive, saying "ma'am."  However,
he will only lie down on his back for so long.  His second reply is sullen, much like
the dog who gets up by walks away from his adversary.

Friday, January 18, 2013

What are the four kinds of people in Maycomb according to Scout?This question is from the book, To Kill a Mockingbird.

It is actually Jem who tells Scout about the four
different types of people in the world of Maycomb and To Kill a
Mockingbird
. In Chapter 23, Atticus explains to Jem that it was one of the
Cunninghams on the jury who held out for as long as he did before finally giving in and
voting Tom Robinson guilty. Jem is amazed to find that this man, who apparently was one
of the mob trying to lynch Tom Robinson at the jail, could suddenly turn around and
decide to set him free. Atticus explained that you had "to know 'em" first. It was from
this talk with Atticus that Jem gained his foresight about different types of
people.


"You know something, Scout? I've got it
all figured out, now... There's four kinds of folks in the world. There's the ordinary
kind like us and the neighbors, there's the kind like the Cunninghams out in the woods,
the kind like the Ewells down at the dump, and the
Negroes." 

Thursday, January 17, 2013

In the poem "Success is counted sweetest," I would like to understand better the idea of the last two lines.

Wow! It must be hard studying the poetry of Emily
Dickinson if English is not your first language. Good on you for doing this! Well, if we
think about the last two lines, they of course relate to the rest of the poem and the
way that the soldier who is described as "defeated--dying" can hear the sounds that the
victorious army are making as they celebrate their success. Note what the last two lines
say:



The
distant strains of triumph


Burst agonised and
clear!



The "distant strains"
here are the distant sounds of triumph that "burst" upon the dying soldier. Of course,
because he is dying in failure, they burst "agonised and clear" to highlight his lack of
victory. However, let us not forget the central irony. It is this dying, defeated
soldier that will understand success better than the victorious army, Dickinson
suggests, as it is he who desires it so badly that "counts" success to be "sweetest." I
hope this helps!

In The Witch of Blackbird Pond, what is Matthew Wood's reaction to Kit?

I take it you are referring to when Kit arrives at her
Aunt and Uncle's house without informing them that she was planning on staying with them
for good. The answer to your question can be found in Chapter Three, that narrates Kit's
surprise visit on the Wood household and the various reactions to this strange newcomer
in this drab, Puritan world. Whilst the other members of the Wood family are pleased to
see Kit and welcome her in, her Uncle, Matthew Wood, is shown to be less than pleased.
Note how he is shown to respond to Kit's presence and her news that she will be staying
with them:


readability="7">

Matthew Wood had not sat down at the table with
the others. Though he had said nothing, Kit had been aware that not a motion had escaped
his intent scowl.



Thus we can
see that he is not happy about the new arrival, and this impression is confirmed when he
leaves and stumbles across the trunks that Kit brought with her. Note how he asks about
them "coldly."

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

What is making Rafaela grow old in The House on Mango Street? Who is Rapunzel, and why does Rafaela dream of having hair like hers?

In the chapter titled "Rafaela Who Drinks Coconut and
Papaya Juice on Tuesdays," Esperanza narrates the story of Rafaela, a young woman who is
married to a controlling man.  Esperanza says that Rafaela is growing old because her
husband forbids her to leave her home, and thus she feels like all her youth is being
taken away from her.  She watches other people from her window and wishes that she, like
them, could go dancing and have friends.  Instead, she sits at her window watching all
her dreams slip away.


Esperanza compares Rafaela to
Rapunzel, a fairy tale character who is trapped in a high tower and cannot escape.  One
day she lets her incredibly long hair fall out the window so that a prince can climb up
her hair to rescue her.  Esperanza makes this comparison to suggest that Rafaela also
wants someone to rescue her from the dungeon of her home and her controlling
husband.

What is the important lesson of friendship from The Cay?use a quote from the book and explain the answer

Theodore Taylor's novel, The Cay,
explores the relationship that develops between a pair of shipwrecked castaways: young
Phillip, and Timothy, a West Indian sailor. Phillip has obvious racist beliefs that he
has inherited from his mother, and he demonstrates them during his observations and
actions after he is saved by Timothy, a native of St. Thomas in the Virgin Islands.
Phillip eventually goes blind during their long ordeal, and he comes to depend upon
Timothy. A bond develops between them, and Phillip grows to love the old sailor. Perhaps
the most important lesson learned on the island is that color has no impact upon the
bond of friendship. Phillip matures during his stay, and his own innate dislike of
African-Americans disappears as he grows to first depend upon and then love Timothy.
Like the old adage "love is blind," in The Cay, friendship can also
be blind.



I
remembered that ugly, welted face. But now, in my memory, it did not seem ugly at all.
It seemed only kind and strong.


I asked, "Timothy, are you
still black?"


His laughter filled the
hut.


Tuesday, January 15, 2013

What Are The Meaning Of Some Names In Brave New World?My teacher says that in every book, no name is without a meaning or purpose, and recently my...

More than most novels, Huxley uses historically
significant names to give the flavor of the personality of the characters in Brave New
World. Let's take a look at some of the main characters and see why they were probably
given the names that they were. Remember that none of this is for sure, since we cannot
ask Mr. Huxley, however the following explanations seem
plausible.


Lenina Crowne may be a form of the communist
leader Lenin, and we all know that communism promotes conformity of the people. John
Crowne was a dramtist who specialized in romantic love. Lenina starts as a conformist
and ends up falling in love with
John.

John may be taken from the
biblical John the Baptist, who was a prophet who fortold the coming of a new age (much
as John revealed the flaws in the Brave New World). Savage was a last name given him
because  he lived among the savages.

Bernard Marx's
name may come from George Bernard Shaw who believed in socialism and women's rights (
Bernard disliked women being treated like meat).  His last name may come from Karl Marx
(the founder of communism) who believed the lower classes would someday overthrow the
oppresive ruling class.


Mustafa Mond may come from many
leaders from the East who were named Mustafa, and Mond (which translates "world" from
the French). The fictional Mustafa's last name, Mond, means "world" in
French.


Helmholtz Watson may be a combination of a famous
physcist and scientist who conducted experiments similar to the baby roses and books one
in Brave New World.


See the link provided for a more
comprehensive list.

Provide a characterization of Shahrazad of the The Thousand and One Nights (also known as The Arabian Nights).

The story of A Thousand and One
Nights
, also known as The Arabian Nights, is built upon
the structural framework that allows all of the stories within to be joined in single
purpose, rather than presenting a string of tales that are seemingly
disconnected.


Shahrazad is the woman who marries Shahrayar,
a powerful ruler. Having found his first wife unfaithful to him, he killed her. Now he
marries a virgin each night and kills her the next day, in this way guaranteeing that
his "wife" will remain faithful. It is no surprise that it soon becomes difficult to
find a wife for the ruler. This is the framework of the story: Shahrazad marries
Shaharyar, but her stories every night are so wonderful, that her husband does not kill
her because he wants to hear more of her stories. This premise is what ties together
these unrelated tales.


Shahrazad is in the story very
little, providing the story's essential framework. However, we can still characterize
her based on what we do know. First of all, she is brave. Her father is the vizier who
is in charge of obtaining a new wife each night for the ruler. When he tells his
daughter of his concern of being unsuccessful, Shahrazad offers herself, even knowing
she might well be killed the morning after the marriage. This shows she is brave, but
she is also self-less. It is her generous nature to save other women in the kingdom that
motivates her to agree to the marriage. Having listened to a story her father relates to
demonstrate the danger that awaits her, Shahrazad makes a plan with her sister Dinazad;
Shahrazad she will ask for her sister to visit the new couple on their wedding night.
Then Dinazad will request a story from her sister with the permission of
Shaharyar.


The wedding takes place, the marriage is
consummated, and Shahrazad makes her request. Shaharyar grants the request and his wife
begins to tell her stories, but only until dawn. He is so delighted, that he puts off
the execution for another night. This shows that Shahrazad is clever
and entertaining. She is clever for thinking to use the stories to
beguile her husband to allow her another day of life, and entertaining in that she tells
the tales with such skill that Shaharyar cannot wait to hear what she will tell him
next.


And so she continues to tell him a new story for one
thousand and one nights. To be able to continue for so long, Shahrazad must also be very
intelligent.


During this time Shahrazad bears Shaharyar
three sons. On the last evening of her stories, she asks her husband for a wish: that he
spare her life for the sake of her children. The tale is told that by now Shaharyar
deeply loves his wife and agrees without hesitation.


There
is a great celebration, the people are joyful, and Shahrazad and Shaharyar "live happily
ever after."

Monday, January 14, 2013

Define the concept of the Byronic hero.

The Byronic Hero is the idea that set apart Byron's
writing from other Romantic thinkers.  The Romantic notion of the self and subjectivity
was enhanced in the Byronic Hero, a protagonist who was set apart from the outside
world.  The Byronic Hero is "different" from the social norm, a rebel with a cause.  The
cause of the Byronic Hero is the pursuit of how life should be, as opposed to what it
is.  The Byronic Hero possesses the belief of being the only sensitive soul in a world
of crushing insensitivity.  Among the characteristics of the Byronic Hero would be that
the character is similar to Byron himself:  "Mad, bad, and dangerous to know."  This
helps move the Byronic Hero as an utterly Romantic individual, or one who embodies the
Romantic tendencies.  In the Byronic Hero, the full force of what it means to be an
individual, to be one who is sensitive to elements that others are not, is brought out
in force as it is a construction of how Byron might have seen
himself.

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Discuss briefly the theme of reputation in Beowulf and provide examples from the text.

The world of Beowulf is one built on
oral tradition.  In the poem, this is reflected in the importance the characters assign
to being remembered (after they die gloriously in battle, presumably).  The importance
of reputation surfaces throughout the poem, but it is when Beowulf arrival at the hall
at Heorot and in his conversation with Unferth that the importance of reputation is
established.


When Beowulf arrives, he does not present
himself as if his being respected is a foregone conclusion.  He introduces himself not
by simply stating his name and his place of origin, but by providing a kind of resume of
his exploits.  Unferth, hearing what Beowulf says and the reactions of those around him
to Beowulf's words, challenges his reputation.  He
says:


Beowulf's quest,


sturdy
seafarer's, sorely galled him;


ever he envied that other
men


should more achieve in
middle-earth


of fame under heaven than he himself.
-


"Art thou that Beowulf, Breca's
rival,


who emulous swam on the open
sea,


when for pride the pair of you proved the
floods,


and wantonly dared in waters
deep


to risk your lives? No living
man,


or lief or loath, from your labor
dire


could you dissuade, from swimming the
main.


Ocean-tides with your arms ye
covered,


with strenuous hands the sea-streets
measured,


swam o'er the waters. Winter's
storm


rolled the rough waves. In realm of
sea


a sennight strove ye. In swimming he topped
thee,


had more of
main!


Unferth actually has the nerve to challenge Beowulf's
account of his exploits.  Unferth questions Beowulf's reputation, something that must be
addressed immediately and decisively by Beowulf.  To this end, he responds to this
challenge, saying:


"What a deal hast uttered, dear my
Unferth,


drunken with beer, of Breca
now,


told of his triumph! Truth I claim
it,


that I had more of might in the
sea


than any man else, more
ocean-endurance. 


[...]Together we twain on the tides
abode


five nights full till the flood divided
us,


churning waves and chillest
weather,


darkling night, and the northern
wind


ruthless rushed on us: rough was the
surge.


Now the wrath of the sea-fish rose
apace;


yet me 'gainst the monsters my mailed
coat,


hard and hand-linked, help afforded,
-


battle-sark braided my breast to
ward,


garnished with gold. There grasped me
firm


and haled me to bottom the hated
foe,


with grimmest gripe. 'Twas granted me,
though,


to pierce the monster with point of
sword,


with blade of battle: huge beast of the
sea


was whelmed by the hurly through hand of
mine.


Beowulf is determined to set the record straight,
because any threat to his reputation would be disastrous.  He cannot fathom being
remembered for being a liar or as someone who accomplished nothing honorable in life. 
Throughout the poem, Beowulf and the other characters continue to acknowledge the
importance of reputation to their own lives but also to those of their families. 
Similar examples can be found throughout the poem.

In A Raisin in the Sun, what is Ruth's relationship with the other family members?

In the play Ruth seems to play the role of mother figure
to all characters. She acts as peacemaker during the various conflicts that go on
between her family. She looks after Travis and does her best to bring him up. She speaks
to Mama on behalf of her husband. Note how she tries to sooth Mama after her argument
with her children:


readability="7">

RUTH (Soothingly, older than her
years)
Now.... you taking it all too serioiusly. You just got strong-willed
children and it takes a strong woman like you to keep 'em in
hand.



It is interesting that
Ruth is described as "older than her years." It is clear that in this family she is the
mature one that manages to hold all of the disparate elements
together.


However, her role as mother figure is most
cemented by the discovery that she is pregnant. Her decision to keep the baby is one of
the key indicators that suggest hope for the Yonger family as they move to their new
place and confirms Ruth's role as nurturer of the Younger
family.

Saturday, January 12, 2013

In Ender's Game ch.9, Graff asks Valentine to help Ender. Why does she reply with an allusion to the Bible story of Danie's interpreting dreams?

I believe she is referring to Graff as the king who
forgets the dream. Graff took Ender from his family to make him into a heroic commander
that would save mankind by shaping the good Ender into an aggressive, violentone. She
knows this and so does Graff. Graff's advisors and game programmer are supposed to
interpret the Giant Game that Ender is playing as to his readiness to proceed up the
chain of command. They are stumped when Ender keeps seeing his older brother Peter's
face in the mirror instead of his own reflection. This part of the game keeps Ender from
finishing.


 Valentine is the prophet here. She wants the IF
to know that they will take the good child Ender and make him into the twisted, evil
Peter who likes to hurt people and animals, who wants to rule the world. By pressuring
Val into writing a letter to Ender (who will actually be allowed to get and read this
one) reassuring him that he will not be like Peter ever. Her loving message allows Ender
to successfully complete the End of the World game, even though both she and her younger
brother know the message is contrived. Ender's communication with the only person who
loves him solves the game with an act of love. His success will lead him to become the
youngest commander ever.

I'm doing a project and its on what kind of clothing are on the characters from the book "Midsummer Nights Dream" By William Shakespeare.So i need...

This is really up to your own interpretation. If you want
to go the traditional route, you can dress the characters as Elizabethan. However if you
want to stage the play differently, it has been done modern or with a more "magical"
theme. Because there are the supernatural characters as well as human characters, some
costumers have chosen to clothe the supernatural characters different than the
humans. 


The Athenians are often dressed in medieval
clothes, with the women in gowns with empire waist and lots of trims, using rich fabrics
like velvets and headdresses with flowing scarves. The men can be costumed in tights and
tops with puffy sleeves using jewel tone colors such as deep royal blue, a forest green,
purple, or maroon. 


For the supernatural
characters, Titania, the Queen of Fairies could be dressed in a flowing gown with
gossamer fabric, wings, and flowers in her hair. Oberon, the King, can also have fairy
clothing, dark woodsy greens and browns, wearing a
crown. 


Puck should be dressed in a whimsical outfit with
tights and a tunic of sorts, perhaps with a jagged hem, and maybe some vines trailing
around his body. He is an earthy, whimsical character, and is often portrayed wearing a
sprite-ish style costume. 


All of the fairies could be
clothed in flowing, light fabrics, earth tones and light colors, and earthy accessories
like flowers and leaves. 


Nick Bottom should wear a donkey
head or donkey ears, which could be papier mache over a helmet of sorts or could simply
be a pair of fabric donkey ears on a headband; the fabric could be a stiff felt or some
fake fur over cardboard. 


These are common ideas that are
usually used to costume the characters in "A Midsummer Night's Dream." But as this is a
play, and open to artistic interpretation, nothing is set in stone. It might be fun to
do an interpretation where the humans are Elizabethan and the fairies are modern, or
anything you can think of!

In which ways is 1984 by George Orwell similar to One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest by Ken Kesey?I know that both novels touch on the themes of...

Both novels point out some of the faults of systems that
are based on the system over everything else.  If you look at the ways that Big Brother
and Nurse Ratched maintain control over the inmates or the population, the irony is that
both of them are incredibly abusive and destructive while purportedly working for the
best interests of those groups.  Of course the reader quickly learns that they are only
acting to maintain power and to maintain the status
quo.


Both novels also use one "sane" or insightful
character to point out and demonstrate the flaws and idiosyncracies of the ruling
power.  Through the perspective of this character, the reader is treated to a wide
variety of experiences that show the importance of examining such systems and some of
the destructive tendencies they have for the most thoughtful and most intelligent
members of their societies.

How do I make the solution in my own essay, which is based upon "A Modest Proposal," sound humorous or satirical?

This is a great assignment you are doing as it will help
you to analyse the strategies that Swift employs in his own modest proposal that makes
it so successful and powerful. The best place to start is to think about your own tone
as the proposer of your solution. One of the ways that Swift makes his essay so powerful
is that he actually assumes the voice of a economic planner who is very careful to back
up his solution with a number of facts. He comes across as compassionate, caring and
sensitive to the situation in Ireland. This of course makes his abominable proposal all
the more shocking. Notice how he tries to present himself as a fair and thoughtful man
before presenting his solution:


readability="12">

As to my part, having turned my thoughts, for
many years, upon this important subject, and maturely weighed the several schemes of
other projectors, I have always found them grossly mistaken in their
computation.



Note how Swift
only comes to his conclusions after "maturely weighing" the ideas of others. Phrases
like this serve to boost his credibility before the actual unveiling of his not so
modest proposal. Adopting a similar strategy by establishing a similar tone as a writer
will help create the satire you are after. Good luck!

Friday, January 11, 2013

Does anyone have an interesting thesis idea along the heroism theme or masculinity theme for The Red Badge of Courage? I really need help with a...

You're going in the right direction, I think. It's been a
very, very long time since I last read that novel, but when I did last read and teach
it, I was struck by how often the novel builds up the idea of patriotism and of male
achievement in war (mostly in the fantasies of the young male protagonist) only to let
all those ideals fail in the moment they’re most needed and to show the young man
(Henry's often not called by name in the novel) again and again failing in his courage
or fortitude or whatever you want to call it.


You may be
interested in exploring how Henry develops a fuller awareness of things once he’s away
from the crowd of men, when he is isolated and exposed to the horror, for example, of
the corpse in the forest. The alchemical transformation in the final lines of the novel,
the change in the imagery from lead (rainclouds) to gold (the sun’s rays), may signal
that some sort of transformation in Henry has indeed taken place and that he has finally
become a man. In the end, then, you may see the novel as in some ways criticizing the
ideals of “manliness” and “patriotism” yet at the same time embracing some notion of
what a “real man” is, someone who alone faces a crisis and
survives.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Describe how Shaw uses the rain as a plot device in the opening act.

George Bernard Shaw's "Pygmalion" begins with "torrents of
heavy summer rain" falling on a London street scene.  A group of pedestrians has taken
shelter near a church as people scramble about looking for
taxies.


Shaw uses this setting to bring together all the
main characters of his play in the first scene.  Freddy, who will become Liza's lover,
is looking for a taxi for his mother and sister.  Liza is trying to sell flowers to the
people waiting for taxies.  Colonel Pickering, who is among those waiting for a taxi,
buys some flowers from Liza.  Higgins is standing nearby, taking notes on Liza's
interesting way of speaking English. 


If not for the rain,
all these people would not likely be found in the same place.  Shaw uses the rain as a
plot device to introduce his characters and begin his plot.   

What is the main conflict in Chapter 1 of The Outsiders?

The main conflict in Chapter 1 is between Pony and the
Socs.  You can see this from the very start of the
chapter.


Pony comes out of the movie theater and starts
walking home.  Then the Socs jump him and start threatening to cut his hair off or to do
even worse things to him.


So, to me, this is the major
conflict in this first chapter.


If you are wondering what
kind of a conflict this is, it is pretty clearly a man v. man conflict.  It is one in
which two people or groups of people are in conflict.

Who is Madame Ranevsky in The Cherry Orchard?

The biggest flaw of Madame Ranevsky's character in this
excellent play is her complete inability to "move with the times" and recognise how her
Russia is changing in so many different ways. When it looks as if she is going to be
losing her estate and orchard, she shows herself to be characterised by a kind of
paralysis that does not help her to save it. Although she is kind and also generous, she
shows that she doesn't know how to manage either her money or the complexities of adult
existence. Even though she is facing the imminent loss of her property, she continues to
spend money freely, even lending money to her neighbour when her finances are in such
dire straits.


Madame Ranevsky is dominated by nostalgia.
She can only see the orchard as it was in her idealised childhood. Ironically, although
she is deeply distressed by the sale, she finds that she actually experiences a sense of
liberation when she is freed from all of the worries of managing such big estate. In her
character, Chekhov paints a human face representing the many landowners who lost their
land at this time in Russia.

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Why does Hamlet recall the story of Priam and Pyrrhus in Act 2 of Shakespeare's Hamlet?Does it reflect it any way upon Hamlet's own situation?

To understand Priam and Pyrrhus in
Hamlet, we first have to identify the two men who are mentioned in
the allusion.


The characters are from the stories of the
Trojan War. For this allusion to be effective, most of the Elizabethan audience the play
was performed for would have known of the story. Priam is killed by Achilles'
son Neoptolemus (also known as
Pyrrhus).


It is possible that
Hamlet is comparing Pyrrhus to his uncle, Claudius. Some sources record the presence of
Piram's wife, Hecuba, who helplessly stands by watching the murder. Hamlet wonders if
perhaps Gertrude stood by and watched while Claudius murdered King Hamlet. By doing so,
Gertrude might knowingly have aided Claudius in the murder. But this idea is swept aside
when the ghost of Old Hamlet speaks to his son while Gertrude (not
seeing the ghost) watches. The ghost confirms that murder was not her sin. Instead, the
ghost tells Hamlet that judgement for the crime she has committed—marrying her
brother-in-law (seen as incest by the Elizabethans)—should be left to
heaven.


The comparison that Hamlet makes seems clear
enough. It is, however, ironic and provides an instance of sad foreshadowing (of which
Shakespeare most certainly would have noticed and used intentionally) that Priam also
kills Pyrrhus' son. By the end of the story, through conniving treachery, Hamlet
has been poisoned by Claudius and
dies. 


In terms of the choice of Priam and Pyrrhus, Hamlet
is drawing a parallel between the murder of Priam by Pyrrhus, and the murder of his
father, Old Hamlet, at the hands of Claudius, who then "steals his throne and
wife."


Ultimately, it is impossible to be exactly sure how
Shakespeare intended to use his reference to Priam and Pyrrhus, but it is clear that he
is drawing attention to the idea of one man killing another.

What is the significance or result of the German invasion of Denmark and Norway?

Norway was an important source of iron ore,
but there were two more important reasons for the German invasion.  Primary was the
strategic location of the country
, and if the British had seized Norway
Germany would have been outflanked to the north before the war was well underway.  This
not only would have been disastrous in terms of losing control of the northern seas and
the exit from the Baltic, but would have left the British in control of a direst route
to Finland and Russia.  The primary reason Hitler invaded Norway was to forestall this,
which was indeed the plan of the British.


Although those
two reasons were important, there was a third very important reason.  That was the
company Norsk Hydro, the world's only commercial source of deuterium,
known as "heavy water."
This is essentially water with an extra hydrogen
atom, and which was used as the moderating agent to control the reaction of uranium in
atomic research.  The method of creating an atomic bomb which was being pursued by
German scientists depended on heavy water.


German, Russian
and British scientists had been working on an atomic bomb since before the First World
War.  Norsk Hydro's production was immensely increased during the war, but the shipment
of large quantities was stopped by various means.  There were several attempts at
sabotage, some successful, and one major commando raid on the plant.  It could not be
successfully destroyed by bombing because of its position inside a steep valley at the
base of a mountain.  In February of 1943 the facility was heavily though temporarily
damaged by a raid carried out by Norwegian and British commandos, some of whom had been
living on the snow covered mountains for months.  On 20 Feb., 1944, the Germans shipped
a large quantity of deuterium in barrels on a ferry down Lake Tinnsjo; the ferry was
sunk by a time bomb set by Knut Haukelid, a Norwegian commando.  This was essentially
the end of Germany's attempt to create an atomic bomb, although it was actually beyond
their capabilities.  They simply did not have the money or manpower available to carry
out the massive industrial effort required at the time.

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

In Romeo and Juliet, is conflict presented as positive or negative?

In order to fully understand and answer this question, it
is important to understand and identify the different forms of conflict presented in the
play.  Once you have identified the conflict(s), you can look at the effects of each to
see whether conflict is generally presented as a positive or a negative
thing.


Conflict means a problem in the story.
Romeo and Juliet presents several examples which all revolve around
the same two basic problems in the story.


  1. The
    Capulets and Montagues hate each other.

  2. Romeo (a
    Montague) and Juliet (a Capulet) fall in love but must hide their love because of the
    family feud.

Now, observe the following list of
some of the effects of the above
conflicts:


  1. Street fights which disrupt the peace
    and call for the threat of harsh punishment for
    fighting.

  2. Neither Romeo nor Juliet have open
    communication with their parents and look to other adults for
    advice.

  3. Romeo and Juliet both lie to their parents and
    get married in secret.

  4. The deaths of Mercutio and
    Tybalt.

  5. The banishment of
    Romeo.

  6. More lies, a fake death, then the real deaths of
    Romeo and Juliet (as well as Paris).

  7. The families resolve
    their conflict at the funerals of their
    children.

When you consider the list of
consequences in light of the two basic conflicts in this story, at least six examples
portray negative outcomes and only one is positive.  Generally speaking, this presents a
strong argument that conflict is presented as negative.

How does public health differ from personal health?

The concept of public health consists
in promoting all-round programmes for the prevention and treatment of diseases/health
hazards of a group/community/nation conducted by governments/semi-goverment
agencies/non-government organizations in different domains of social/public life. The
goals of such programmes include awareness building, prevention, management/erradication
with regard to all sorts of threats towards the health and hygiene of the people. Public
health programmes deal with:


* environmental awareness
campaign ;


* awareness of infectious diseases
;


* vaccination/erradication programmes
;


* supply of pure drinking water
;


* services to provide standard health care for all
;


Personal health, on the other hand,
is all about individual health care: washing hands, taking balanced diet, regular health
check-up, to be in touch with health care professionals etc.

Can (sec x - cosec x) / (tan x - cot x) be simplified further?

Given the expression ( sec x - csec x ) / (tan x - cot x) We need to simplify. We will use trigonometric identities ...